New Delhi: A group of students on Monday approached the Delhi High Court who claimed that the Ayush course could not be under the national feasibility test (NEET) because the examination was limited to modern scientific drugs and not including traditional medical courses.
Looking for a stand from the Central and National Test Agency in this case, the division bench led by the chairman of the judge D.
Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh issued a notice of six Ayush aspirants.
Furthermore, the court said he would hear the problem on March 30 along with another request submitted by a group of doctors Allopathic who had moved by the court to oppose the Ayush practitioners to do some operations.
Also asked the central advice of the Monika Arora to provide details of the application for allopathic doctors.
Safe! You have managed to throw your voteogin to see the results
During the trial, the court also commented that there was a double standard in the application.
“On the lighter side, you are on one side saying you are competitive.
But when asked to appear in Neet, you say we don’t,” said the court while lugging both things for the next hearing.
In the Ayush Aspiran petition, it is maintained that their courses operate differently and they are fundamentally different from medical institutions that provide degrees, diplomas, or licenses in Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, or homeopathic drugs.
They also said that the shared entry test was unstructured to take into account the feasibility criteria to enter the Ayush course.
Claiming that NEET for the Ayush course violates Article 14 which provides equality before the law or equal protection for laws, candidates say they are not against the entrance test system but against the NEET to take into the Ayush – Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Homeopathy, Unani Siddha, and Sowa Rigpa.
–Ins.
JW / SHB /