Suneeel Darshan’s filmmaker has taken the legal route to stop the copyright infringement of the film ‘Ek Haseena Thi Ek Deewana Tha’ on YouTube.
The filmmaker has accused that the exclusive content is being termed by several users in the video hub, causing it to lose big.
In his penis, filmmakers have named Google CEO Sundar Pichai and some Google Exployeeee.
“My film, which I haven’t uploaded anywhere and is not sold to anyone in the world, found on YouTube with millions of scenery.
I keep asking them (Google) to be interesting and I just walked from the pillar to the post.
I feel very frustrated ; leave without choice I have to go to court.
And fortunately, the court gave me and instructed the police to file fir.
There were more than a billion violations and I have a record of each.
It’s about these people who claim that they followed that they followed.
Law and now they don’t have a system in place.
Those who monetize my videos benefit.
I don’t want to challenge technology, but technology abuse, “said the filmmaker to Ethimes.
Read Alsosuneel Darshan Remember the Association with Akshay Kumar
Providing a legal perspective on this issue, Suneel Darshan Aditya’s lawyer stated, “With their actions uploading the audio-visual and audio film ‘Ek Haseena Thi Deewana Tha’, YouTube and their officials not only supple the market and the value of intellectual property rights from audio-visual and audio Films, but YouTube also unfairly enriching him by generating large income through advertising and other sources through content exhibitions.
Darshan has complained to Youtube / Google and his officials several times, but they ignore their complaints and continue to get great income for themselves in Mr Darshan costs by exploiting its intellectual property rights illegally.
”
While Suneel Darshan considered all its legal choices, filmmakers also did not mind settlements.
“I just struggled for my rights.
How can someone use my content, exclusively protected by copyright to me, not sold to anyone, not shared with anyone, on the platform.
And then they have their own reasons, and they even Don’t delete it.
I have lost all the value of the film and they have done it before, it’s a different case, “he signed.
FIR in this case was submitted on January 25 below 51, 63 and 69 of the copyright law.
