Mumbai: Affection of the Narcotics Control Biro (NCB) Director Zonal Sameer Wankhede Who moved Bombay High Court on Thursday for protection from the arrest, the Maharashtra government said that it would give him a clear notice of three days if needed to take any action against him.
HC bench from Judge Nitin Jamdar and Kotwal Nest recorded this statement carried out by the Aruna Pai prosecutor at the officers’ instructions present in court and said, “We did not make comments about the advantages of the case.” When the bench passed the order and recorded his statement, PP said letting it forward as a court order and not a state statement.
The court said the need to hear about the advantages and observing the country could show some “respect” to the ranking officer as hers.
Wankhede moved HC a day after he appeared before the probe ordered against him for the actions of alertness.
Senior Adviser Atul Nanda with Advocate Ramiza Hakim appeared for him to say his request for urgent assistance seeking temporary protection against the action of coercion, including his arrest because they said that the state had also established a special investigation team (sitting) to investigate him on several charges.
Nanda said, “Investigation, if any, was carried out by the Central Investigation Bureau (CBI) or even the National Investigation Agency (NIA).
Give a probe to CBI or Nia but stop the vyllation.” “I was personally attacked by the state.
My concern is that the country is Will arrest me anytime.
I want temporary protection in the form without coercive assistance, “Nanda said for HC, added,” I saw the design in posting against me.
I consciously not took any name because I wanted to keep the legal majesty.
” Nanda said Wankhede was the director of Zonal NCB who was investigating a case.
“He is not a drug vendor,” he said, stating that while Wankhede faced an investigation of vigilance by NCB who was willing to face and face.
“The state has surpassed its duty.” He quoted part 17a from the prevention of corruption which he said gave a previous sanction to be taken from the center if the central and state government officials had set up to investigate it.
HC asked Nanda, “If the law itself protects you, why do you want to protect from the court?” Nanda at the hearing on Thursday replied that under the law, the state could not investigate and “if the state violates its duties and surpasses, the court can Stepping out and protecting me if my rights tend to be violated.
They might arrest me today.
“Pai said,” The petition is premature.
We have received four applications that also oppose private individuals including Kiran Gosavi.
We only conduct initial inquiry.
So far This we haven’t registered the FIR against Wankhede.
” He said the country had just received a petition and needed time to answer.
Additional Police Commissioner Milind Sawant was present.
HC asked PP, “What about the argument about part 17 a?” PAI replied, “We were investigating Gosavi’s individuals.
Don’t know what happened.
He (Wankhede) asks for blanket protection.
I need time to answer his petition.” PP said, “Today, we haven’t registered the FIR below today PCA.
Part 17 A will come when fired.
“HC asked,” What is the sequitol?, “And PP said,” It is very difficult for Maharashtra countries to make any statements “, and he took another time to negotiate court.
PAI finally said that the state would provide 72 hours notice to Wankhede in concerns of corruption cases.
Nanda said his concern was that the state could capture Wankhede in the case of IPC and the petition would be considered infrared him if he responded to the summons that had been revealed and Nanda said Wankhede was present and questioned by sitting for three hours.
HC then recorded a PP statement and discarded the application.