Hyderabad: The day after the Supreme Court questioned the use of Telangana from the actions of ‘Draconian’ whose Prevention of Dangerous Activities (PD) Act, TOI found that nearly 350 people in all countries requested that action against them in 2020.
Of the number, 267 were from three commissioners In the capital city – Hyderabad, Cyberabad and Rachakonda.
There was also an accusation that the action was used to continue accusing prison for a long time even after they got a guarantee.
Meet Salman Khan, a resident of Humayun Nagar, who was arrested in July 2020 along with a friend.
Both were accused of being cheating on Hyderabad police in five different cases.
Apart from Salman get a guarantee in all cases, he was still behind the bar because the PD law was involved opposing it after he was released from prison.
The Supreme Court said on Friday serving the notification to the Telangana Government and questioned the 1986 action after a woman challenged begging her husband by Telangana police.
While issuing notice, the top court said he was surprised that no one challenged actions for years.
People like Salman’s father, Hakeem Khan, a businessman, felt that PD actions must be used only to those involved in murder, efforts to rape, dakoity and other serious violations as a threat to the community.
It should not be called accusing allegations such as violations and violations of white collars.
“Except in the case filed against my son at the Chandrayangutta police station, four other cases were submitted without evidence,” Khan said.
“It has become a general practice for the police to submit several cases only to create reasons for monoking PD Law.” Take a case of a fortune teller in the Nalgonda district which gets a guarantee in four cases of cheating after being in prison.
However, over the past three months, he was still in prison because PD laws had slapped him.
Senior Criminal Lawyer Muzafarullah Khan said the action must be called only if there was a disruption to public order and also quoted an example where it was called to someone, who was accused of stealing two vehicles.
“There are differences between law and order and public order,” he said.
“As far as disturbing public order, most people must be affected.
Using PD acting against the defendant who has obtained a guarantee, is a violation of the right to freedom and the right to get a guarantee.
The police have requested PD action based on assumptions and assumptions.
Instead of using action, police must look for cancellations of guarantees if the defendant repeats a violation that violates the guarantee conditions.
“A Senior Telangana police officer told Tii,” The Supreme Court has not taken objections to the law.
Judges have sought written statements, which are legal procedures.
Regarding the observation that it is Is Draconian’s law, it is for Parliament, the Assembly and the Supreme Court to decide whether it must be changed or removed.
The police only apply the law.
“The police claimed that the ‘aggressive prayer’ of the PD Law since 2014-15 has resulted in a drastic decline in the crime rate at the crime rate States.
T’Gana Cops slapped PD’s action to continue accused in prison after a guarantee
