Nagpur: Cancel Nagpur Decision of the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court on Wednesday decided that the two-year period was prescribed based on the ‘land acquisition law, 1894’ for the acquisition process because it did not reward the award that did not apply to awards after the 2013 Law began to apply .
HC has canceled the acquisition of 203.86 hectares made in 2011 for the Gosikhurd project in Bhandara, after the villagers of the village of Ambadi approached him on July 27, 2017.
The Applicant has prayed to stop the compensation award on October 30, 2014, argues that Act 1894 should have passed Within two years from the date of declaration, which before August 8, 2014.
HC survived that the award of October 30, 2014 will have no consequences, because the acquisition process has run out.
Executive Engineer Development of Vidarbha (VIDC) Irrigation Works on the Mega Project then knocked on the Apex Court door.
“HC assessments put aside the appreciation and resisted that the acquisition process was offended.
It was held that the acquisition process had not been lying, and the award was legal and valid.
The appeal is permitted in the provisions mentioned above without the order for costs,” the division bench consisting of Judge Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna was held.
The bench makes it clear that part 25 of the rights to compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement, 2013 ‘will apply to government awards.
“The period in which the HC command will hinder the action in the part of the authorities to continue the awarding will be excluded when calculating the period below Section 25.
Thus, the period May 26, 2014, when HC has still operated from the 19th March 2014 notification, until the new notification on August 13, 2014, excluded must be excluded.
The award is said on October 30, 2014, in any case carried out on or before the extended date of March 20, 2015.
Therefore, the appreciation concerned applies, “said the Top Court.
Judges asked the Maharashtra government that it could conduct an investigation to refer to imputation regarding the manipulation and suspension of awards and take corrective and corrective actions as needed and to ensure such situations do not appear in the future.