Nagpur: Bollywood Vijay Raaz actor has drawn demand for sexual harassment challenging allegations of sexual harassment against him after the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court refused to cancel the Chargesheet against him.
The complaint was submitted at RAM Nagar Police Station in the Gondia for violations can be punished under section 354A and 354D IPC.
“When the application was placed in front of the court, Akshay Pandya’s advice, appearing in the name of Akash Gupta, proposed that the Applicant had given instructions not to invite order and want to attract the application.
Receiving his statement, his request was dismissed as being withdrawn.
The court did not provide detailed demands Ignoring the application, “the division bench consisting of Judge Vinay Deshpande and Amir Borrow.
The bench had previously clarified his intention to stop the Raaz application after guiding Chargesheet.
“We have heard senior avinash gupta advisors and additional applicants leader Sanjay Doifode in detail.
They ask to delay hearing to get instructions from the applicant on whether he wants a decision or desire to attract the application,” said the judges said.
Chargesheet was submitted after survivors, who worked with actors as assistant directors in the ‘Sherni’ film set starring Vidya Balan in Gondia, accused him of sexual violations during the shooting.
Raaz was used to call him to his room with the pretext of some urgent work but only passed time.
On October 27 last year, he tried to keep his hand above his shoulder, repeat his actions and passed comments.
After congratulations on filing a complaint to the Gondia Police on November 3, the 51-year-old actor was booked based on the 354A and 354D IPC section.
He, however, was released on the guarantee by the Gondia JMFC on the same day.
The police then submitted a chargesheet on December 12 at the JMFC court.
The applicant argued that the victims had submitted this case to slander his reputation and gained popularity, and it was only an imagination of his imagination.
The contents of the chargesheet clearly show that the contents of the FIR were not made, he pleaded.