Cricket Confusion Cricket India has not yet communicated with the team over the replacement of mumbai: In the classic case of the left did not know what the right was doing, BCCI had been busy last week moving around circulating the Indian cricket team concerning.
On June 28, the manager of the Indian Team Girish Dongre wrote an email to the Chair of the Chetan Sharma Selector – in accordance with his own board protocol – asking for two replacements in Indian troops, Post Shubman Gill came out and another batsman.
Read Alsoiam India wanted Prithvi Shaw as an opening in EnglandPrithvi Shaw, after a disappointing tour of New Zealand and Australia, returning home to release absolute anger at Vijay Hazare One-Dayers this season, being the first Cricketer to print 800-plus running at a single edition of the tournament , In doing so, he also solved MS Dhoni and Virat to replacement especially for two reasons: a) After a gill injury, the bench has an empty slot for the opening; b) BATSMAN ORDE Top-other because the Indian team will be based on England for two months and must be other unfortunate injuries to befall, quarantine rules will not allow replacement and last minute travel.
It’s been a little more than a week and Sharma hasn’t responded to the email.
Toi asks Sharma if he receives an email and former Indian Pacer says, “You need to talk to the BCCI operation team about it”.
There has been no response from the operation team.
Also read the Election Committee about sending Prithvi and Padikkal to England? The management of the Indian team in the UK wants a young open appetizer Prithvi Shaw and Devdutt Padikkal to join the side but the question is being appointed about whether the chief Chetan Sharma is on the same page as the thought -Tank thought.
The Indian team is freting in the UK, ahead of their series – in a way – aiming to be one of the “final frontiers”.
Those who know said, “Even if BCCI doesn’t want to send a replacement, why not only spell it.
That way, Virat and the rest can concentrate on what’s in hand”.
BCCI, not really known for its communication, remains uninterrupted and has not found time or need to reply to the letter.
For notes, letters sent by the team manager do not ask which cricket needs to be sent as a substitute.
The letter only requested replacement and Onus solely located in the national voter – Sharma and his colleagues – to arrive at a decision.
Meanwhile, in Sri Lanka, the management of the Indian team – oversees the white ball series with the island country – do not know whether Prithvi Shaw and / or Devdutt Padikkal will be there for the entire series or may have to travel to England.
“Even if they don’t have to travel and BCCI doesn’t consider replacing for England, at least not these two names, the council can at least deliver ‘not’ that is clear about this problem and ending it,” the source said.
BCCI has sent a Jumbo squad to Australia in November last year, which has proven to be a shot on the arm for the team.
Although injury was marched during the tour, the team management had an adequate replacement thanks to the volume of the bench.
“They sent only 24 Cricketers to England, where four were standards.
Abhimanyu Easwaran has done it well in first grade cricket but is fair to make him debut against James Anderson, Jofra Archer and Stuart Broad? Kl Rahul is not considered an opening but in the middle order .
So, if Gill’s injury demands a replacement, and if there is time to fly in one, what is the loss? “Trialed with fire? The opening idea with Abhimanyu Easwaran was confusing, the 25-year-old Bad Batsman was clearly a talent to be chased.
“But to hurry like this and don’t give ears for what the team thinks is not a healthy sign,” said the source.
In the end, BCCI wants to see the demand for the Indian team and serve them is a call that will be taken by national voters and the council secretary, which holds a selection meeting.
But not communicating with the Indian team is the wrong BCCI place this is wrong at this time.