New Delhi: In recommending nine judges for the appointment to the Supreme Court, Collegium SC Fivemember seems to have replaced many HC judges and ignores the two important criteria described by Bangku 9 SC in various regions and religions.
Community.
With the pension of Navin Sinha justice on Wednesday, SC has a work force of 24 judges, including four owned by Bombay HC, each of which three to Delhi and Andhra Pradesh (not divided), two to Karnataka, Allahabad, West Bengal and Rajasthan, while one Each to Kerala, Punjab, Gujarat, Haryana, TN and Assam.
Countries that remain not representen in SC for a long time are six countries NE, Odisha, J & K, Himachal, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim and Goa even though these countries are in their justice pool which meets the requirements for HC judges who can , use their regional balance approach, go up to SC.
In a Tuesday night meeting, the Collegium SC consisting of CJI and Judge of Lalit Law, Am Khanwilkar, Dy Chandrachud and LN Rao chose Judge Hima Kohli (CJ from Telangana HC), BV Nagarathna (Karnataka HC), Bela M Trivedi (Gujarat HC), As Oka (Karnataka HC CJ), Vikram Nath (Gujarat HC CJ), JK Maheshwari (Sikkim HC CJ), CT Ravikumar (Kerala HC), MM Sundaresh (Madras HC) and the only one from Bar-ex-Asg Narasimha.
Times Look at the Collegium SC decision is a positive step in the direction of carrying gender parity which is needed in a higher court corridor.
Next piece Skew Regional Representation Philoshythis is the first time that the Collegium has chosen 3 judges for the appointment for SC.
The last appointment of the Collegium picks will mean that India may get the main justice of her first woman in Justice Nagarathna when competing 80 in 2027.
Recommendations from nine oblique philosophy of regional representatives.
Appointment of Judicial Kohli will take the number of judges in SC from Delhi to four, while the appointment of OKA justice meetings will support up to five SC judges with Bombay as their parents.
Judge Nagaratha will take the representation of the HC carnataka in SC to three; Nath justice will take the representation of HC Allahabad in SC for also three.
This means that only six states – Maharashtra, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, UP and Tamil Nadu – will take into account more than half of the 34 judges in the Supreme Court, while many others will rule.
Collegium consists of five judges owned only two HCS – two of Andhra Pradesh (not divided) and three of Mumbai.
Recommendations of nine names have also caused a considerable heartburn among the many senior judges, who have led a high court for a long time and established replaced by a much younger HCS judge who was not appointed as CJ from HC.
The main judge who was replaced from the HCS was also state-owned, which had not been represented for a long time.
This will definitely happen, as CJI recorded just a few days ago, setbacks for many people who legally aspire to be chosen for the promise of accusation of SC.
While expelling the union government from the election of the judge for the Constitutional Court and drafting the “Judge-Judge-Judge” system, the Supreme Court in 1998 in the case of the third judge said, “Merit is the main consideration for the needs of SC.” This is emphasized by RF Nariman justice In his farewell speech last week.
He insisted on the appointment of two, who did not find a place in the list of nine names chosen by the Collegium to make an appointment for SC on Tuesday.
In the 1998 decision, the SC said, “Where, therefore, there is extraordinary achievements, the owner deserves to be appointed despite the fact that he might not stand upright in the list of Indian seniority or in the High Court.
All of that then needs to be recorded when he recommends it For an appointment is that it has outstanding services.
When competitors for the designation to SC do not have extraordinary rewards but have, however, the services needed at a level are more or less the same, maybe there is a reason to recommend one of them because, For example, certain regions in the country where the parent HC is located not represented on the SC bench.
“
The choice of colleagium caused heartburn because many judges were replaced
