Bareilly: The experiments in the case of Kheri Lakhimpur’s violence began on Monday at the Justice Judge Court through video conferencing.
Thirteen of the defendants, including the Ajay Mishra UNI Minister Teni Mishra, was taken from prison where they nested and produced before the judge.
Ajay Mishra’s Brother-in-law Virendra Shukla, who has been charged under section 177 of the motor vehicle law, given a guarantee after he gave up before the court.
He was accused of hiding the third SUV in Ashish convoy which allegedly hit more than five people – four farmers and a journalist – who at that time protested the current agricultural law rolled.
This case later on the day sent to the district and the session court where the next trial will be on January 20.
“This is procedural and followed in every criminal case after Chargesheet was submitted and framed accusations,” SP Yadav Senior Prosecution Officer told TII.
The special investigation team (sitting) has submitted a chargesheet of 5,000 pages against all who were accused of January 3 in connection with the violence that took place on October 3 last year.
Four farmers and a journalist were allegedly trimmed by Ashish convoys.
Three BJP supporters were killed in a retaliation by farmers who were angry.
Putra Ministers are the main accusations in this case.
“After Shukla guarantees, two advice, Ramashish Mishra and Chandran Singh, appeared on behalf of 12 defendants and were equipped with a chargesheet copy by the court.
All the defendants appeared through video conferencing at 4 pm.
At that time, the court had completed the procedure to do the file to District Courts and sessions, where this case is expected to go for further trials from the next hearing date, “SPO said.
Ashish advice Awadhesh Singh has received a copy of the previous Charges.
A first pine was listed below section 302 (murder), 147 (riots), 148 (riots with deadly weapons), 149 (violations carried out in the prosecution of general objects), 279 (rash driving), 338 (causing other people’s sadness by taking action Anything so hurry), 304A (causing death due to negligence) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) IPC.
On December 14, sitting called an incident “planned and not negligence” in court.
The court then dropped parts related to “accidents” of FIR and included part 307 (efforts to murder), 326 (voluntarily causing painful wounds using weapons that tend to cause death), and 34 (criminal acts were carried out by several people on a sustainable general intention ) IPC, along with section 3 (25), 5 (27) and 30 of the ARM acts.