Mumbai: Eleven years after 18 students of physiotherapy from medical colleges who were bound to Kem Hospital were ordered in a criminal case for allegedly combining 10 juniors by forcing them to take obscene acts, the court of judges this week recognized them after two of the three victims were overthrown In court and do not support this case.
“Even though there are 10 victims displayed, the victims who have been examined do not support the prosecution, especially indulge in the defendants or any role that connects them.
Therefore, there is no evidence that is thinking to prove the guilt and indulge in accusers in crime,” said court.
“Taking the stock of evidence in totality, I argue that there is no cogen and clear evidence to tighten the obligations of criminal ragging, intentional insults by harassing and restrainment of the defendant to hold them.
The prosecution failed to establish important ingredients and the identity of the defendant, “Court said.
The defendant was then aged 19-20 and included another part of the country.
Father of one who was suspected of being a victim, an ATS officer, has complained to the deputy dean in January 2010.
While giving their statements to college authorities, the students later alleged that some of them were asked to enforce constipation, while some were told to make advertisements for women’s underwear.
On January 3, 2010, a meeting of the anti-ragging committee was carried out, where the conclusions were withdrawn that senior mistakes fell on ragging ambitions.
A pine was put forward at the police station Bhowada against 18 seniors to do, participate, conspiring or distributing ragging against 10 students.
They were ordered under the bomb of the bomb of Ragging and part of the Indian punishment code.
Thirteen witnesses continued during the trial.
Among them also the three students who then turned hostile, then the Dean representatives and investigative officers.
One of the suspected victims, told the court that the defendant was his senior.
Contrary to the prosecution case, he said on January 2, 2010, between 5 pm and 6pm, his senior called him to the Naigaon hostel and a relaxed interview and the introduction was taken.
He firmly refused that they forced him to do obscene acts.
Allegations of other victims also gave the same statement.
However, the son of ATS officers, rec-alled saw several students being tattered through obscene acts and handed himself afraid.
He said he ran out of the dorm room and called his father.
However, referring to his statement, the court said that it appeared randomly and unclear because there was no name of the victim or the perpetrator given despite its specific knowledge.
“The evidence of this witness is very blurred and has no meaning by associating the pleasure of the defendant or any specific action that numbered Ragging,” he said.