: The family of victims of a small rape accused the threat because it was accused of being together, the last word was favored by the police – News2IN
Noida

: The family of victims of a small rape accused the threat because it was accused of being together, the last word was favored by the police

: The family of victims of a small rape accused the threat because it was accused of being together, the last word was favored by the police
Written by news2in

Greater Noida: The family of a 15-year-old girl who was allegedly kidnapped from Harianatpur Village and was raped by two young men in Harianatpur Jewar Village had accused the threat of one of the one who was accused of being removed by the police who had been removed by police who had been removed by name.
from the chargesheet submitted in this case.
The girl in class VIII when she was picked up from her house on April 28, was found from Lucknow five days after the incident where she was found in rented accommodation with the main allegations who were married men.
The family accused Amit (26) charges along with neighboring Pankaj (22) who lived in the girl kidnapped the girl and took the girl near the bushes along the freeway Yamuna and raped her.
“My daughter was picked up by the Pankaj who raped with Amit and the last one took her to Lucknow.
He recovered from Lucknow five days later where Amit kept it,” said the girl’s father.
However, the police then removed the name Pankaj who was accused of Chargesheet citing “investigation” and stating that the involvement of the PANKAJ was not found in this case.
The girl’s father experienced a suspicion that the PANKAJ was “liked” by police with a female police officer with the name Neelam Chaudhary who was supposed to be married to a friend of the Pankaj.
“On the 3rd night, when the girl was taken to the police station from Lucknow, Neelam Chaudhary slapped him and told him not to name the Pankaj in his statement under the CRPC 161.
However, then in his statement under the CRPC 164., a girl named Pankaj and Amit Both of them .
Pankaj has never been arrested and his family continues to threaten us, “he said.
He said that members of the Pankaj family including three brothers, namely, Keshav, Sagar and Kapil, laughed at them and mocked him.
“They made a threat to us saying that they would pick up my second daughter too.
I have three daughters and we are afraid to get out of our house,” he said.
The girl’s father further accused Pankaj Suresh’s father to hold power in the area because he was “wine supplier.” The family accused that the defendant’s family issued a threat to them claiming that they had a relationship with superiors with those who used His name was removed from Chargesheet.
The family has shared their trials with Mahila Shakti Samiti – NGOs who work for women’s welfare.
Anju Pundir, Secretary NGO told Ti that he spoke to the girl who seemed very scared.
“We talked to the girl and found that she was very scared.
We will demand that at least the right investigation must be done before issuing her name from Chargesheet,” he said.
In the girl’s video, he could be heard saying that Neelam Chaudhary beat him and threatened him not to mention the PANKAJ.
The family has provided complaints to women’s cells on Thursday.
When contacted, the police were planned but said that the family had a fight with the Pankaj family a few months ago because they wanted to “frame” the PANKAJ.
Sho Sho Umesh Bahadur told Ti that Neelam Chaudhary would get married in the village of Pankaj and just told the girl why she gave the name Pankaj when she was innocent.
“We have called the Father of the girl and the girl to the police station and a female police will be deployed to listen to the problem,” he said.
Additional DCP (Law and order) Shraddha Pandey, who currently holds the cost of the DCP (Safety of Women) to the Toi that he will ask charges of personal interests on the Cerelam Chaudhary section.
“So far in our investigation, the PANKAJ was not found involved.
Investigation will be based on technical evidence,” he said.
(The identity of the victim has not been revealed to protect its privacy according to the direction of the Supreme Court about cases related to sexual violence)

About the author

news2in