Jalandhar: Announcement of around 20 agricultural groups to make the front of the political in Punjab only increase the political fluidity that has applicable in the state.
If, before it was a dispute in Congress, who continued to send division signals, which added this fluidity, now the agricultural group did it.
When strong differences have emerged in agricultural groups because several larger unions have not supported the idea of ​​political parties, this has the potential to achieve their greater image than life, fresh from victory to get three agricultural laws revoked.
Even their supporters appear divided.
The raging debate has existed throughout the social media platform, not only about the impact of the future of the agricultural movement, especially when Sanyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) previously announced that their agitation was only suspended and did not end, as some important issues were still delayed including MSP, but also About larger political scenes in Punjab which will also have an impact on perceptions at the national level.
Before challenging the other party in the battle of direct election, agricultural groups that decided to oppose the election must address these questions raised by their friends and supporters.
See the results of polls and voting data from the last three elections – 2014 and 2019 general elections and assembly selection of 2017 – show space for the third alternative in Punjab.
AAP received 24.5% of the election of shares in 2014, 23.7% in 2017 and in 2017, only 7.38%, but the Punjab Democratic Alliance and BSP Alliance received 10.77% of the votes, which reflected around 18% of voters Do not choose Congress or SAD-BJP fellowship.
However, when the battle of the election has its own dynamics, the agricultural group now has a different challenge.
They have not appeared as a cohesive force and with internal fighting affected, they have lost part of their sheen.
All the same, their presence can change polls, even because there is no clarity about their level of rise.
If the agricultural group decides to go alone in the poll, they may have a maximum impact on AAP, which has projected itself “the only third alternative”, regardless of failure and shortfall of the past, in Punjab.
Now, with farmer groups in Medan, they will be considered the latest alternative and not deleted.
How both AAP and Agriculture groups – share their support base can be measured from the fact that the first gets most of the four parliamentarians in 2014 and most of its 20 mlands in 2017 from the parts of Malwa which are the last fortress.
In Barnala, Sangrur, Mansa, Bathinda, Faridkot, Moga and rural areas of the Ludhiana district, AAP has performed very well and this is an area where trade unions also have maximum support for Kadrebased.
Even as a trade union, including BKU (ugrahan), BKU (Sidhupur) and BKU (Dakaunda) have decided to stay away from the election, there is a probability of cadres and supporters they chose for a party claiming to be a representative of farmers.
AAP has stated his candidates for most seats in these districts.
When the agricultural group has the largest support base in rural areas, AAP has also announced most of its candidates for dominant rural constituencies.
In the case of the agricultural group hand in hand with AAP, about that there has been a lot of talk and also receives mixed feedback, it can have a negative impact on the congress and sad on the one hand, but on 23 seats, which has been contested by BJP and has a strong bank voting bank And where only the challenge is Congress, they can finally divide the anti-BJP sound.
In particular, AAP only won rural seats in 2017 and did not have many things to be proud of from past records in urban areas.
However, in terms of alliances with agricultural groups, it will improve in the battle of perceptions, especially among anti-BJP voters.
The farm group ‘Choosing Ki Chot’ can hit another party in Punjab
