New Delhi: The former Sarandeep Singh voter felt that the Indian team lost the spark and aggression they had under captain of Virat Kohli.
Sarandeep’s statement came after South Africa defeated India by seven goals in the second Odi to get a 2-0 advantage that could not be canceled in the three-match series on Friday.
“India is a favorite of the first day not only in a test match but even in Odis.
The way they lose a test match.
On the two Indian tests disappear badly but the only thing is not about the players.
It’s about the captain of the way we think Kl Rahul will be Very cool and calm but if you see Captain Virat then he is very energetic and pumped.
In the same way the team is used to play because all players are pumped but now what I think sit from outside somehow the Indian team loses the spark.
They don’t have a spark That and that energy does not exist, “said Sarandeep Ani.
“They scored a big goal because 287 was a big total.
Sa the team played like a champion.
They played disciplined cricket, they played to win.
If you talk about Venkatesh Iyer, he isn’t as fast as that and he is fine in T20.
And him It was a big bat.
Now he hit at number six.
He can’t hit because the field isn’t open.
He struggles there with bats and fails to take the goal, “he added.
Sarandeep also said that Pacer Prasidh Krishna had to be included in playing XI and Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Shami well had to rest, to avoid a 3-0 defeat.
Also read ODI: India can try a variety of choices to avoid more insults to the strategy of the South African team is expected to undergo a paradigm shift with several players who get subtle messages but stern to lift their games when they face the shameful possibility of South Africa in the third Africa on Sunday.
“Mohammed Siraj is still injured but I really like Prasidh Krishna.
Young bowler quickly must be given the opportunity.
Jasprit Bumrah or Mohammed Shami both did not want to be rested because you did not want to be 3-0.
So, you need a Bowler experienced there.
So , Prasidh Krishna must be tried and you have to choose Axar Patel in front of Ravichandran Ashwin.
You need someone to contribute with bats, balls, and fields too, “said Sarandeep.
“I think Indian field is also very bad in the way we dropped catches.
You can see how easy the singles are given.
There is no field in the circle and surprisingly Virat Kohli is not visible on the field all the time as if he was lost in the scene.
He gave birth at the limit -What and not visible in the circle.
So, there are some things that are missing, “he added.
Previous voters subsequently said that the Indian team did it very well under the leadership of Ravi Shastri and Kohli, because they brought aggression into the game.
“You see what Ravi Shastri does with the team.
How did Ravi Shastri pump the team.
This team is fine for the past seven years under Ravi Shastri and Virat Kohli and both of them are aggressive and modern cricketes need something like that.
They must Aggressive.
Look at the way SA plays.
They are aggressive and see the way they win, “said the previous voter.
Quinton de Kock (78) and Janneman Malan (91) rose to an occasion with bats because South Africa beat India with seven goal in the second ODI.
For South Africa, Rassie van der Dussen and Aiden Markram remained invincible at 37 each.
Previously, Rishabh’s pants and Kl Rahul each played a knock of 85 and 55 as India posted 287/6 in twenty over given.
Shardul Thakur and Ravichandran Ashwin also played a useful invincible innings of 40 and 25 respectively.
For Proteas, Tabraiz Shamsi returned with two Wickets.