Chandigarh: Hearing the elimination of children between countries, Punjab and Haryana High Court have requested Sonipat Supervisors from Police (SP) to produce small children in front of him through video conferencing on Tuesday and ensure that the minor is not issued.
Regency boundary.
Interestingly, in this case, the mother of the child, currently living in England, claims that the child lives with him in England.
However, it was only during a video call that the father’s father watched the boy fell asleep almost (when he used to call him in accordance with the English timing) and on the investigation found that his son had been abandoned by his wife’s parents’ house in Sonipat.
Worried about the safety of his son, the man had submitted a Habeas Corpus petition before Punjab and Haryana High cadah against the illegal detention of his small son of his in-laws prisoners in Sonipat.
“Given the SONPAT SP mentioned above was asked to immediately help a senior police officer to visit the residence of respondents No.
5 and 6 (father-in-law and brother-in-law) in Sonīpat, found the presence of the Petitioner’s son, and satisfied that he was in safe custody.
Small boy passports are owned and maintained in safe custody.
The police officials concerned will also ensure that children are produced before the court on the next hearing date through video conference mode, “HC commands when fixing the problem for hearing September 28.
Justice H Sidhu passed this order while hearing the request submitted by Sandeep Chugh, Jind residents.
In this case, the couple married in November 2010 and had two children, a daughter (10) and a son (two and a half years) together.
Initially, the couple lived in London for a long time but returned to India for childcare.
They started living in Noida.
The wife left the house without telling the petition of the matrimonial dispute between the couple, the wife left the matrimonial house in March 2020 without telling the applicant, who was abroad at that time.
Since then the couple has bitter relationships and several complaints and cases submitted related to matrimonial disputes before the police and court.
The woman lived with her parents in Sonipat.
According to the Petitioner, in May 2021, his wife went to England and when he knew about this fact, he had submitted an online application before the distribution of high court families in London for commands of jurisdiction inherent in connection with small children looking for a review of summaries of children to India, for locations and passport orders and for various other orders to ensure children’s welfare.
In this case, his wife appeared in front of the court in London through VC and stated that he had moved children from India without the knowledge or approval of the applicant because he did not know his existence.
Through his order on July 26, the distribution of high court families, London directed his wife to make children available to spend time with the applicant by video, and / or phone calls on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at the age of 6 years PM GMT.
Advocate Anil Malhotra, advice for the applicant, who was submitted to HC that the two-year-old son of the Petitioner is currently in illegal detention from the Petitioner’s and his wife has gone to England leaving him behind.
The applicant captured that his son could be removed to the purpose of being kept secret abroad or another place outside the court’s jurisdiction, advisors told HC.