New Delhi: The recruitment process carried out by competent authorities will not mean “without a timeline”, the Supreme Court said when setting aside orders passed by the Allahabad High Court in matters about the recruitment of police armed with the provincial armed constitution (PAC) in Uttar Pradesh.
The APEX court allowed the appeal submitted by the Government of Uttar Pradesh and the others against the August 2019 command authorized by the High Court Division bench that has upheld the command of a single judge.
The single judge has directed the authorities to allow the applicant, who is one of the candidates in the recruitment process, to appear to verify documents and physical fitness tests for police position in accordance with the recruitment advertised in 2015.
“in every event, even though the indulgence is shown in the case Previously, the line must be withdrawn at a certain stage because if not, the recruitment process carried out by competent authority will not mean without the timeline and the next recruitment process will also be affected since the determination of the number of vacancies for the next process will continue to fluctuate, “benches consisting of Judge Dy Chandrachud and when Bopanna said.
The APEX court recorded in his assessment that the recruitment process had begun in 2015 and verifying documents along with physical fitness tests held in 2018.
“Some candidates who were permitted in accordance with the orders of the High Court have participated in early January 2019.
Because sufficient time has passed after It won’t be appropriate to make an exception in the case of respondents at this stage because of the opposite, droplets will continue, “Bench said.
It was said by a single judge, as well as the high court division bench, was not justified in their conclusions.
The bench was recorded in its verdict that the authorities had published advertisements in 2015 to recruit police to PAC (male) with direct recruitment.
One candidate, who has approached the High Court, has been applied in accordance with advertising and receipt cards issued for him and initial fitness examination is also held.
The bench noted that to complete the selection process, these documents must be verified and candidates must be subject to a physical fitness test that will be made further as the next stage of the recruitment process.
The applicant has moved the High Court who claimed that he could not appear for physical fitness tests and document verification for the desires of written communication from the authorities concerned.
Authorities say that candidates, who are asked to appear for physical fitness tests and document verification, are intimidated by issuing SMS via cellphones on numbers equipped in the application.
They say some other candidates, who have received such an SMS, have emerged and took part in the process of verification of documents and physical fitness tests.
The Petitioner before the High Court has accused that he cannot appear in the process because he is not intimidated by the authorities by post.
The applicant has accused that the authorities did not adhere to the requirements intended based on the Uttar Pradesh police rules (Civil Police), 2008, in accordance with the summons that must be incurred.
The APEX court noted that the single judge of the High Court, although it did not record the findings of any violations or non-compliance with any rules, it had concluded that there was an alertness in the part of the authorities because an applicant would not intentionally participate in the recruitment process.
The authorities then approached the division bench, which upholds the direction issued by a single judge.
During the fight in front of the upper field, advice that emerged for the authorities said that maintaining a large number of applicants and finished processes, the candidates were directed by sending SMS to appear to verify documents and physical fitness testing.
The advice that arises for candidates has argued that the rules contemplate that intimacy must be sent by post, but there is no intimacy released for him.
The APEX court observed that in certain cases, the person might not stay at the same address equipped with communication when the application was made and it was for candidates to intimate every change to the authorities.
The bench said it was not a candidate case that he had not received an SMS and it was only a technical opposition he should be intimidated through post communication.