Prayagraj: The Government of Uttar Pradesh (above) on Friday told Allahabad High Cadd that the order of disciplinary authorities was 24, 20 February 2020, where further investigation was directed towards Dr.
Kafel Ahmad Khan, a pediatrician suspended from the Brd Medical College of Gorakhpur , it has been withdrawn.
Dr.
Kafel was suspended from service on August 22, 2017, after the death of around 60 babies at the Brd Medical College Hospital due to lack of oxygen.
During the court process, additional advocacy General Goyal Manish, representing the state government, told the court on Friday that the command (on February 24, 2020) has been pulled subject to the freedom provided for respondents – the parties concerned – to continue in this problem And remember what was recorded by this court in the order of July 29, 2021.
Aag is increasingly delivered that all efforts must be made to conclude the process of discipline within three months in a period of three months.
Taking AAG statement on notes, Yashwant’s Justice Varma said, “It only left the court to consider justification to continue the suspension of the Petitioner, which was made in accordance with the commands continued on August 22, 2017 by the state government.” After submitting a submission, AAG asked the court to allow him to get the instructions needed in this matter.
Therefore, the court was directed to make a list of this petition on August 10, 2021 for the next hearing.
In the current WRIT petition, where Dr.
Kafel has challenged his suspension and further investigation, he has revealed that at first the trial was taken against nine people.
“The seven of them were suspended along with the applicant have since been restored while waiting for the conclusion of the disciplinary process,” added Dr.
Kafel.
In the current WRIT petition, the Petitioner Dr.
Kafel has challenged the suspension order on August 22, 2017.
Additional challenges have also been carried out for the command 24 February 2020 which was approved by the Disciplinary Authority, which has received a report submitted by partial investigations officers, different opinions with the findings Returned by an investigation officer in connection with two charges and directed further investigations to do.
Previously, the investigation officer had sent a report on April 15, 2019.
After that, the disciplinary authority chose to pass the order for further investigation on February 24, 2020, almost after 11 months which were also challenged.
In the order of July 29, 2021, the court while noting this, it has observed, “the delay in taking further action from the discipline is not explained.
The respondents were also obliged to justify the continuation of the sequence of suspension which continued for more than four years.”