New Delhi: The Supreme Court has refused to re-examine its decision which stated the reservation for the Maratha community in Maharashtra as illegal and not constitutional and also held that only the center has the power to approach society and social education and education.
In an important decision, SC has been said on May 5th, the majority that only the President (Read Center) can make a decision to declare the community to the back of socially and education to provide reservations and uphold the 102st constitutional amendments that stung the country’s strength in this matter.
When the verdict can have a broader consequence on sensitive ordering problems, the center also submits a petition review looking for a re-examination of the SC interpretation of the 102st constitutional amendments.
But a five-law judge Ashok Bhushan, L Nageswara Rao, S Abdul Nazeer, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat, who had given a verdict about the legality of Maratha’s reservation, refused to re-examine this problem.
“We have gone through the petition review of the assessment.
The reasons taken in the petition review are not included in the foundation of limited where the review petition can be considered.
The reason has been handled in the main assessment.
We did not find enough place to entertain this petition.
Petition reviews Dismissed, “said the bench in the order on June 28, uploaded on the SC website on Thursday.
While giving a verdict, the five jury’s constitutional bench unanimously on the validity of the 102st constitutional amendments but they are different from the imademic implications for identifying social and educational backwards (SEBCS).
While Judge Rao, Gupta and Bhat concluded that the amendment had taken the power of the state to decide Sebc and only the president who could make decisions, Judge Bhushan and Nazeer were held that countries could also identify reservations in their territory.