New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday asked a applicant to notice that the cases registered and the people were arrested for allegedly attaching critical posters of Prime Minister Narendra in connection with the vaccination drive against Covid-19.
The Apex Court said he could not issue a blanket order to the police not to register a shot to post posters who criticized the central vaccination policy.
Judge Dy Chandrachud and M R Shah gave Applicants Pradeep Kumar Yadav a week to pay attention to individual cases registered against people and said that he should do his homework instead of just relying on newspaper reports.
Yadav said the case was filed in NCT from Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Lakshadweep and the police could be directed to provide a copy of FIR to him.
The bench said, “We also read newspapers.
Lakshadweep’s controversy is something different.
The woman in question is given anticipatory guarantee from the Kerala High Court.
Don’t bring the controversy in this problem.
You told us about the cases listed in Delhi and other places “.
The top yesterday refused to issue the direction to the police by saying it would give them notice.
“You have to do your homework.
We did not issue the direction to the police,” said the bench and posted this problem to hear further next week.
Yadav has submitted a request that strives to cancel the registered shot by Delhi police for allegedly attaching posters who were critical of the modification with the vaccination drive against Covid-19.
He has been looking for direction to the Police Commissioner Delhi not to register further cases / firs related to posters / advertisements / brochures of Covid-19 which have appeared in the context of the ongoing vaccination drive.
Yadav, who also practiced advocacy, has said that he is looking for the pleasure of this court to intervene with “illegal capture of innocent general public” because their speech and expression by the pamphlet method is affixed to the walls that are now spread on social media.
He said the court had held the Catena case that freedom of speech and expression regarding the public causes were fundamental rights of every citizen who was guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.
Advocates refers to the best 2015 verdict in the case of Shreya Singhal where section 66a act canceled and recently in the case of Suo Motu in Covid management, where state authorities were directed not to register criminal cases that were seeking medical helping on social media.
“Unlike the decision of this court, the authorities registered fir against innocent people for their hatred speech against the Prime Minister in connection with his official function during the second wave of the Covid-19 crisis and government vaccine policy,” Para Plea said).
, The applicant claims that at least 25 FIR has been registered and 25 people have been arrested in connection with the poster that has appeared in the capital.
“The Petitioner here is looking for the termination of FIR / complaints, direction to the Police Commissioner, DGP, not to register other cases / pine in connection with posters / advertisements / brochures of Covid-19 which appear in the context of vaccination and cases as careful citizens about policy status Holidays “, said the request.
It was said that the FIRS had been submitted under the IPC 188 section (disobedience to order correctly announced by public servants), and 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection of dangerous diseases for life), and those who were under the prevention of Delhi from the Law Property and epidemic actions.
Petition has said that a 19-year-old dropouts dropouts, a 30-year-old e-rickshaw driver, 61-year-old wooden frame maker is between 25 people captured by Delhi police for allegedly sticking to posters with critical comments on the Prime Minister regarding the vaccination drive Covid.
The request has also searched for directions to the center and Police Commissioner Delhi to call notes about the listed firs in this matter.