New Delhi: The Dutch NGO received assistance from the Supreme Court after his complaint against the NGO managed by the Andhra Pradesh family, who was accused of deceiving RS 24 Crore for 10 years in the name of providing assistance to Surcor to 5,000 different children in 300 country villages, canceled by Andhra Pradesh HC.
Judge Mr.
Shah and BV Nagarathna criticized HC because it canceled criminal complaints against his wife and is therefore accused of a vague assessment and said, “Now, the court court must continue with the trial of the three charges.” ‘Friend is indeed “approached by the NGO association owned by the NGO association Families for rural construction and action research (Ardar) in 2004 begged funds sweetly – speaking of their activities very similar to foreign NGOs.
Taken by a high promise to care for 5,000 different children in 300 villages and open children’s village for children Children with orphans, foreign NGOs transferred three million euros (RS 24 Crore) to Ardar between 2004-2014.
However, finding many promised schemes have not taken off, Netherlands NGOs through Johana Maria Legend submitted a criminal charges of complaints that NGOs owned the family has sucked a large number of funds intended for children purchases in Indonesia names themselves.
Legend submitted criminal complaints and the AP police submitted a accusation sheet.
Then the agreement was achieved between foreign NGOs and family heads, who had NGOs, for R.
Embur assets.
However, not much returned.
However, utilizing the agreement, the wife and son of the defendant moved HC which was seeking arrangement of criminal complaints against them claiming that since the agreement was between the main defendants and foreign NGOs, they did not have a role to play.
HC trusted them and canceled the complaint.
Appearing for foreign NGOs before SC advocated Vipin Nair and PB Suresh argues before the head bench by Justice Shah that the commission of the violation was not rejected and therefore HC was wrong in stopping all complaints against his wife and sons accused, which clearly would hug humans to take advantage during the trial.
The bench agreed and said, “We argue that the assessment and order that is revealed is passed by the entire criminal process of private respondents – accuses NOS 2 & 3 (wife and son) – unsustainable.
HC has surpassed.
In its jurisdiction in harming the entire criminal process With very serious violations, in the implementation of power under the 482 CR.PC, with vague assessment and order.
“” Even HC hasn’t noticed the accusations filed against the defendant who after a thorough investigation.
Only because of the next MoU, Defendant NOS 2 & 3 Does not sign and only signed the main, which is meaningless.
The defendant NOS 2 & 3 was not involved in the commission of a violation, “said the bench, reversing the clean chit given by HC.
“It is necessary to note that the violations alleged by the defendant along with other IPC violations are for violations based on section 120-B read with 34 IPCs.
If the criminal process against A-2 & 3 is set aside and set aside in this case, the benefits will immediately go to A -1 Also as a violation below section 120b and 34 will be excessive, “said SC.