New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday convinced the leader of the Congress and Senior Advocate of Kapil Sibal that it would take a litigation petition of public interest demanding action against those who pamper themselves in hatred speeches and calling for armed actions against the minority community in the trial and Delhi last month.
Looking for hearing urgent pills, submitted by Journalist Qurban Ali, Sibal told Chairman of Justice N V Ramana and Judge Surya Kant and Hima Kohli who even though the police had registered two APIs, there was no arrest of almost a month.
“‘Shasukatrameva Jayate’ (armed action might win), it seems to replace our national ethos ‘Satyameva Jayate’ (the truth can win),” he said in anxiety.
CJI assured him about the initial list of pills in front of the right bench and said, “We will take this problem.” Ali said, “Hatred speech has been delivered between the 17th and 19th of December, in two events held in Haridwar (by one Yati Narsinghanand), and in Delhi (by organizations that owned themselves as ‘Hindu Yuva Vahini’) with a clear purpose War against a significant part of Indian citizens.
“Open calls for Muslim genocide made in speeches to achieve ethnic cleaning, he said, added,” The speech was not only a speech of hatred but the amount for open calls for the murder of the entire community.
The speech with Thus, it causes a big threat not only to the unity and integrity of our country but also endangers the lives of millions of Muslims.
“Accepting the authority of the footless approach of part 153a which is related to violations of promoting disharmony, hostility or feelings of hatred between various groups with religious reasons, race, place born, residence, b Ashas.
The applicant quoted a viral video where one of the accusations openly acknowledged the loyalty of the police officers with the organizers and speakers of Dharam Sansad.
“The contents of the speech eat a valid discourse that strives to rearrange the Republic of India as exclusive, and what does not have space for culture, tradition, and other practice.
Such discourse by itself is a constitutional guarantee violation given to the minority culture and religion India, “he said.
Journalists said, “The speech openly and explicitly described Indian Muslims as a regional companion, and as land predators, Hindu livelihoods and women, thus creating paranoia and feelings that are fully produced under ordinary Hindus.
The discourse argues That Indian Muslim and Hindu citizens have competitive interests, and for the latter to prosper and achieve cultural self realization, the nature of the Republic of India must be changed with Hindu countries.
In the form of moderate, the discourse advocates for active social and economic boycott, and in some cases Physical extermination.
“Uttarakhand police on January 3 submitted the quarter below Prabodhanand Giri, Dharamdas Maharaj, Premanand Maharaj, he told him.
The Supreme Court to take a request against hatred
