New Delhi: The debate in the TV news channel causes more pollution than anyone with a statement made in the court excluded from the context, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday.
The bench led by the Chairman of the NV Judge Ramana said that everyone had their own agenda and statements taken from the context in this debate.
“You want to use some problems, make us observe and then make it controversial, and then just blame the game that will remain there …” observing the bench also consisted of judge Dy Chandrachud and Surya Kant.
“The debate on TV creates more pollution than anyone.
They don’t understand what’s happening and what the problem is.
Statements are taken from context.
Everyone has their own agenda.
We can’t control.
We focus on working on the solution,” he said.
The observation of Apex Court came while hearing a request related to air pollution in Delhi and a side by side.
Oral statements came in response to the submission of senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the Delhi government, that burning propellers are one of the air pollution contributors to be handled and referred to the central figures on this issue.
Public lawyer Tushar Mehta refers to television debates and said they claimed that he had misled the court above with the contribution of propellers for air pollution.
“I witnessed some irresponsible and irresponsible sayings on TV media to me that I mislead the court for questions about the propeller by showing that his contribution was only 4 to 7 percent.
Let me clarify,” SG said.
However, the top field said: “We are not misled at all.
You said 10 percent but was shown in a statement that it was 30 to 40 percent.” This type of criticism will definitely occur when we are holding a public office.
We are clear, our conscience is clear, forget all this.
This kind of criticism continues.
Our conscience is clear and we work for public improvement, “said the bench.