The Pennsylvania Supreme Court announced on Wednesday that it had been canceled in the appeal actor and sexual confidence Bill Cosby.
Cosby appealed the confidence on the grounds that the original district lawyer involved in this case decided that Pennsylvania would decline to criminally demanding Cosby for the incident, forced him to provide four oath depositions in a civil suit, where he made him a few burdensome statements.
“There is only one drug that can fully restore Cosby with the status quo ante.
He must be discarded, and prosecution in the future on this particular charge must be prohibited …
For this reason, Cosby’s belief and the sentence assessment is emptied, and he is dismissed,” Writing Justice David Wecht in court opinion.
WechT argues that unconditional charging decisions are made in public and with the intention of inducing the action by the defendant and denying the interests of the decision is unfair.
Different opinions argue that decisions not to be criminally demanding Cosby is not unconditional, but rather, announcements that bind the original district lawyers and their replacement for decision-making processes in the future.