New Delhi: India’s Security Establishment on Tuesday strives to underestimate the controversy over the construction of new villages in China on the disputed border in Subansiri Regency over Arunachal Pradesh by emphasizing that the area has been under the occupation of Beijing since 1959.
The fact, however, still that the village The 100-house on the banks of the Tsari Chu River is in a region claimed by India, and the construction of last year violates a bilateral agreement between the two countries.
“The village is in the area described by the Indian army as a ‘harmful work’ by China.
We can do a little about it,” said an official.
China, in fact, has built as many as 628 ‘Xiaokang’ the model of the Border Defense Village along the line of 3.488 km from the actual control (LAC), stretching from East Ladakh to Arunachal Pradesh, over the past few years.
“While most of these villages are on the side of China Lac, some in areas that are debated as in question in Arunachal Pradesh,” the official said.
This special village focused once again last week after the latest Pentagon’s report on Chinese military forces made a reference to Beijing to build “large 100-house civil villages within the disputed area between Tibet’s autonomous region and last year, as reported by TOI.
Reacting to things This on Tuesday, official sources in Indian security businesses said, “villages along the disputed border in Substairi Top Regency are in the region controlled by China.
They have, for years, maintaining the army post in this region and various construction carried out by Chinese people has not occurred in a short time.
“” This village has been built by China in the area occupied by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) after defeating Pos Rifles Assam in 1959, in an operation known as the Longju incident along the border in Arunachal Pradesh, “added the source.
But there are also concerns The main thing that China risked the claims to disputed areas by continuing to calm people, which are equipped with all the facilities and subsequent subsidies, in the border area.
In addition, the villages of “multiple use” can act as “expanded force storage” When hostility.
This is also seen as a violation of Article VII of the 2005 bilateral agreement, which stipulates “the Guide Principles for Settlement of” Indian-China Boundary Questions “.
It clearly determines: “In achieving limit settlement, both parties will protect the interests of their population who settled in the border area.” Referring to this, an official said, “China can use it to claim the population resolved in such villages will not be disturbed when the limit is resolved.
China, basically, will claim the area as undeniable.” “Of course, this Other problems that the resolution of the border between India and China is not on the horizon.
China, in fact, so far even refused to ‘clarify’ Lac, which will help prevent or reduce face-offs.
Ladakh’s deadlock has just hardened in both countries, ” Add it.