Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday guarantees a 39-year-old woman, a psychologist who lives in Kalina, Mumbai in connection with the case of ‘fake PhD title’.
The woman was accused of being suspected of training at a premium hospital in Bandra (West) for at least two years by ‘use a fake degree’ of a clinical psychologist before she was removed from the post.
HC directs its release with a guarantee association of Rs 25,000 with two sureties.
Advocate Abha Singh appeared for women, Swapna Patker, who also described himself as a film producer too, argued that it was “catching revenge” by the police when the woman filed a case where he was accused of being followed by certain people “allegedly on orders Shiv member Sena Parliament Sanjay Raut.
” He said the arrest was after a woman who filed three petitions in HC against the look.
Raut is not a party for the petition against his arrest in the case of ‘fake degrees’ also named.
Singh argued hard before Judge S Shinde and J Jamadar for a guarantee after a judge refused and slowly even rejected his request.
Singh said the woman, a single mother, was behind the bar “illegally in the case of motivation and mala” for almost two months in a byculla women’s prison.
He submitted the dismissal of the case and as interim assistance looking for guarantees.
The Public Prosecutor (PP) Aruna Pai opposes every relief given as sought.
Singh said “the cost of the IPC that was in no hurry was below Section 467 because of the valuable forging security was called by the Bandra Police.
” There is no stretch of imagination, can the PhD be considered a ‘valuable security’ debated Singh.
The woman was arrested on June 8 “Suddenly”, with the Bandra police landed at his home, said the Abha Singh and Isha Singh advocates.
PAI, HC noted, “Urged with a healthy level of agency that investigates having adequate materials to show, at this stage, that certificate degree PhD is a fake document.
‘”He said the investigation was on.
HC after referring to the” legal position “said,” …
Prima PhD Certificate Facie is not included in the Ambit Definition of the term’ valuable security ‘.
But, he said there might be “some substances’ in the case Prosecutors that “patent errors type and grammar ” in the certificate can betray it forged.” However, at this stage, the most, allegations of violations that can be punished under Section 465 (forgery) can be said to have been prima facie in charge …
However, the aspect of whether violations can be punished under 467 IPCs are a problem to consider.
Because the investigation is underway, we do not propose to learn deep into this aspect, “HC said in his order.
HC said because the investigation was at a newborn stage, the court would not be justified in studying the problem of dismissal cases.
Abha Singh argues that Section 467 is only called to avoid the Supreme Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar and legal provisions a part 41a IPC notification – to issue notifications to seek an explanation when the violations called attract less than seven years in prison.
Singh argued at the court that there was a serious threat to the woman’s life and expressed his concern to him “stalking since 2013” by unknown people.
He said the police submitted a ‘A’ summary report on the closing of the list of stalkers registered in 2013.