New Delhi: Delhi Police argued before the High Court on Friday that there was no considerable innocence that supported the Baron Real Estate Sushil and Gopal Ansal after their belief in evidence of evidence and seven-year prison lines they should not be suspended.
Special Public Prosecutor’s Office (SPP) Dayan Krishnan told Justice Subramonium Prasad that mutilation “Vital Documents” forced prosecution to record secondary evidence in a case that resulted in a very large court process delay.
He said The Ansals, who hatched conspiracies with other co-layers to “secure profits” in the trial in the case of the main Uphaar fire extinguisher by damaging evidence, still benefiting from delays because they are now seeking suspension of punishment because of their old age.
Ansals had submitted a petition before the high court for the suspension of their seven-year prison provisions in evidence to damage the case after the session court, in December, rejected their requests to suspend confidence by the Masters Court and refused to free them.
“There is no innocent suspension.
Is that something so cruel and illegal that the court will disrupt? .
He also told the court that the appeal of confidence was mature to hear before the session court who had agreed to speed it up.
The Prasad was increasingly delivered that the defendant had full knowledge of the prosecution case against them and there was no prejudice caused by them.
On the previous occasion, the SPP argued that every effort was made to delay the trial and repetitive court intervention sought so that the trial took place and now after belief, prisoners could not take the old age base for their sentence suspension.
The police had previously told the High Court that he had a serious objection to the release of Ansal brothers because of the third wave of Covid-19 pandemic and argued that the nature of the violation was such that placing the whole system in danger.
Senior Advocate Arvind Nigam, representing Ansal Sushil, has argued that the “mutilated” document is not even relevant to its mistakes in the main Uphaar trial and his belief in evidence that destroys the case is “justice parody”.
He has highlighted that Sushil Ansal aged more than 80 years and suffered various diseases.
Senior adviser Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Gopal Ansal, also argued that his client over 70 years old and the court must use his extensive and liberal wisdom to release it.
The court was also told that in the case of the main fire extinguisher in the cinema, the applicants were punished and sentenced to a 2-year prison sentence by the Supreme Court who then released them with a payment of RS 30 Crore either after considering the prison of the time they had done.
The fire broke out in the Uphaar cinema during the Hindi ‘border’ film screening on June 13, 1997, claiming 59 lives.
While rejecting the request of ansals for suspension of punishment until the appeal of the confidence by the Magisterial Court was decided, the court session said that the case was one of the great of its kind and its violations appear to be the result of the design calculated in the part of the convict disrupting the course of justice.
Court sessions also refused to suspend their seven-year prison terms each to the former Dinesh Chand Sharma court and the other two – P P Batra and Anoop Singh – in the case and released them on guarantees.
Damaging was detected for the first time on July 20, 2002, and when it was excavated, the department’s investigation began against Sharma and he was suspended.
Then the investigation was carried out and he was stopped from the service on June 25, 2004.
The Masters Court also imposed a fine of RS 2.25 Crore each in Ansals in addition to forcing a seven-year period in this case.
The case was submitted towards the Delhi High Court while hearing the petition by Afut Chairson Neelam Krishnameorthy.
The problem will be heard on January 19.
There is no allegations of innocence Ansals: Police
