New Delhi: There is nothing, even Prima Facie, to suggest that there is intentional behavior in the Shashi Tharoor section, which is likely to drive his wife, Sunana Pushkar, to commit suicide or cause injury or health, limbs or health.
Making this observation, the Delhi court has focused it in the case of his wife’s death.
The court said that the pushkar might feel depressed or experienced a mental disorder of the alleged extra-marriage relationship Tharoor, but mental disorders did not achieve violations of reduction.
Special Judge Geetanjali Goel took it out for violations under the 498-A section (husband or relative of a woman’s husband lowered it for atrocities) and 306 (suicide reduction) from the IPC.
The court observed that it could not be said that suspicion, massive suspicion, was in this case to collect the defendant for a violation below the IPC 302 (murder) section.
“There is no record to show that the defendant made some actions to irritate or disturb the deceased until he reacted or very persuading or suggested the deceased to do some actions to provoke or encourage the latter to commit suicide,” said the court in the order.
Pushkar was found dead in a five-star hotel room in Delhi on January 17, 2014.
A fir Police had been registered by the police on January 1, 2015, against unknown people for murder.
Tharoor was then booked to beat a woman for atrocities and committed suicide.
The court said no one showed the Prima Facie that the defendant had subjected pushkar to physical cruelty.
It shows that there are no reports, one of the doctors or psychological autopsy council, has confirmed that death is suicide.
It is said that even if it is assumed that death is suicide, there are no ingredients for Tharoor, let alone positive actions, to trigger or help their wives to commit suicide.
The court said the Chargeshet seemed to have been submitted in the hope that the court would find several ingredients to continue the trial of the defendant, but the criminal trial requires evidence.
“No doubt a valuable life is lost.
But in the absence of specific allegations and sufficient materials to see materials from various violations and on the basis of the court can, at this stage, accused the defendant has committed a violation, the defendant cannot be forced to face Rigmaroles from criminal trials, “observed.
It noted that even though the Public Prosecutor, emerged for the police, had referred to the defendant to leave the deceased at the airport, not calling a doctor and did not pay attention to him, the same thing could not be described with the intention to leave.
He or escaped him to commit suicide.
“Although it can be repeated that the statement of the Witnesses showed that the deceased was nervous, depressed, feeling betrayed and cheated because of the alleged defendant’s affair, prosecution did not bring anything on the record to show that the defendant had triggered.
Instacing or inducing the deceased to commit suicide.
Some showed open actions on the part of the accused, and only in the field that he continued the alleged affair (even if it was assumed) and exchanged the message with him, it was unpredictable that he had dropped the commission.
Suicide by the deceased, “he said.
The prosecution has examined 97 witnesses in this case.