Prasagraj: Direct relationship cannot be with the cost of the country’s social fabrics, said the High Court of Allahabad while imposing a fine of RS 5,000 in married women, who live with their partners and seek protection from her beingolated husband.
Destroyed the WRIT petition submitted by One Anita and his live-in partner from Bulandshahr District on July 29, a division bench consisting of justice Dr.
Kaushal Jayendra and Justice Subhash Chand was observed, “We do not allow the parties to illegally like tomorrow Has been inaugurated their forbidden relationship.
Life-in relationships cannot be with the cost of this country’s social fabrics.
Directing the police to provide protection to them can indirectly give our approval to the forbidden relationship.
“However, the court explained that this bench did not oppose the relationship Directly but oppose illicit relationships.
A Devendra Kumar is the husband of Anita Applicant, but he lives with other people, who is the second applicant in this case.
He has a relationship with his live-in pair.
He alleged that he had done it because of the apathetic behavior and torture from her husband.
In the petition, he further alleged that her husband tried to endanger their peaceful life.
Therefore, they filed this petition to ask the court to direct the police to give them protection.
Outlining his stand, the court further said, “This court has agreed to such actions in Writ-C No.
11295 of 2021, SMT.
Premwati and others vs.
State-up and others.
We think that we do not take off protection to people people who want to live together despite the reality of the community, caste or sex they have.
“While declining to provide any assistance in this case, the court said,” If Devendra Kumar, who is a legally bound husband of the first applicant has Breaking into the second Petitioner’s house, it was in the realm of criminal disputes that he could move to a criminal engine available in this country.
But no citizens who obey laws that are married under the Hindu marriage law can seek this court protection for relationships Illegal, who is not in PurView from this country’s social material.
“Furthermore,” said the pre-kemawin N.
If he has a difference with her husband, he first moved to be separated from his partner according to the law that applies to the community if Hinduism does not apply to him.
“However, the court explained that this bench did not oppose direct relations but opposed illegal relationships.