New Delhi: Former Attorney General of India, beat Rohatgi, on Tuesday appeared for Aryan Khan in drugs with Cruise Case and made a strong request for his guarantee in the Bombay High Court.
The High Court heard the argument of Rohatgi for a guarantee for Aryan Khan and postponed the trial for tomorrow at 2:30 a.m.
The Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) opposed the Bail Arya Khan application and said that it could affect the process of investigation and institutions needed more time to dig the international cruise drug racquet.
However, Rohatgi firmly stated that there was no recovery of drugs from Aryan and there was no evidence of consumption and said that it was a fitting case for guarantees.
This is what he said to beat Rohatgi in the High Court:
* NCB is present in some strength in the terminal.
They have some information and we are there to catch.
My client and Arbaaz were arrested before they could take a boat.
No one was found from Aryan Khan and they did not show anything.
There is no chance to capture my clients, short and simple.
* We have asked questions in several petitions that even though NCB officers are not police officers, they use police forces.
So they said they had the power to be arrested.
But instead said they were not police officers.
* Arya Khan was invited to a cruise as a special guest.
He was invited by Pratik Gaba who was like an organizer.
He invited Defendant 1 Arya and accused 2 Arbaz traders.
Both are invited by the same person.
The two of them landed together at the roaming terminal.
* There is no recovery from Aryan Khan and there is no medical examination to show that there is consumption.
Arbaaz Merchant has 6 ruc from the Charas recovering from his shoes.
The merchant denies it.
* If there is a group of friends who plan to smoke there is a meeting of mind.
But the plan here was canceled.
They were arrested before.
Consumption penalty.
* Rohatgi said the Supreme Court assessment last year in the case of “Tofan Singh” which argued that NDPS officers were police officers and recognition given to them could not be accepted in evidence.
* The statement recorded by NDPS is unacceptable in court because NCB officials are officers, not the police.
There was a statement recorded below section 67 drawn on the next date.
* What restored small, 6 GMS.
The size is small, medium and large.
This small amount is not enough to keep Aryan Khan in detention.
Many other people have been found with intermediaries and commercial quantities.
There is no part 27A against Aryan.
In its case, part 37 cannot kick because the part below 37 does not apply.
But the session court has held 37 and conspiracy.
There was no previous belief in this case.
* As for the WhatsApp chat, they have a period of time 2018.
There is no chat from a cruise ship.
There are no cases where chat with “1, 2, 3” has something to do with this story.
That chat, we must see in court, to be proven and the results of the evidence.
Chat has nothing to do with the current scenario and then using general phrases such as conspiracy is not true other than that there is no recovery.
* This is a young boy; They can be sent to rehabilitation and they don’t need to undergo a trial.
* There is no Panchnama for the seizure of the phone.
WhatsApp chat is not related to shipping or conspiracy, namely an old chat.
It’s for some people and it is said to be for some international people.
It was in the past and it should show a conspiracy.
There is no case that Aryan knows 20 other people except for traders.
Aryan does not recognize consumption or use.
The only thing is a conscious ownership and that is also a small amount.
* There is no consumption, no ownership …
Why has this boy been sent to 20 days in prison? The maximum is Aryan Khan can be connected to Arbaaz Merchant and A17 (Aachit Kumar) according to the prosecution.
* I have a better case than all of these cases I quote because there was no recovery from Aryan Khan.
There is no recovery, no consumption …: What Arya Khan’s lawyer said in court during a bail hearing
