Thiruvananthapuram: Minister of Union V Muraleedharan on Saturday said those who criticized the bishop of nutmeg because they talked about the dangers caused by ‘Jihad Love’ and ‘Narcotics Jihad’ to the Christian community trying to silence the unpleasant truth.
Bishop critics must clarify whether they support the jihad element, which against who the bishop spoke badly, he said.
“What I understand is that the bishop does not criticize any religion.
He spoke with a small portion of people in religion.
It should be noted that he did not make an executive statement.
The bishop reads from the written text.
That means he speaks based on staunch belief, not emotion.
Because That happened, it was ridiculous to attack him for sharing his sincere worries with his church members, “he said.
The bishop spoke against the jihad element.
The worries he expressed was not a stranger to the Christian and Hindu communities, he said.
“If anyone thinks of silencing the bishop by scare, I want to remind that the times have changed.
When Joseph Master’s palm was cut completely passed,” he said.
The Union Minister said the term Jije Narcotics was not a new use created as trusted by the leaders of the ruling parties and opposition in Kerala.
“The acceptance of narcotics sales is the main source of terror group funding.
It is the responsibility of the bishop to clarify the contents of his speech.
Being a responsible political party, the BJP needs to clarify his holder against coordinated attacks on Bishop Joseph Kallaragah.
We talked with intolerance to political leaders and groups Religion, “said Muraleedharan.
He said there was an information campaign that was wrong to walk in the press as if the United States said there was no ‘love jihad’ in the country.
“What the government said in parliament is that the term ‘love jihad’ is not defined by law.
That does not mean that the government says that there is no ‘love jihad’ at all,” said Muraleedharan.