Chennai: The AK Rajan justice committee was formed by the Tamil Nadu government to study the impact of the NEET in state students was an insult to the Supreme Court and unnecessary or legal futility, the union government had told Madras High Court.
In his written statement, it was put forward in response to the writing petition submitted by the BJP Station of the Nagarajan State BJP official, the center said the executive power of the state, including the power to form a commission, was limited to the subject in its legislative competence.
“The ‘field’ medical education is regulated in the National Medical Commission Law – National Medical Commission Law, 2019.
Nothing is inconsistent or vice versa can stand legally.
Therefore, the state cannot form a panel to study the impact of NEET at medical acceptance , “said the Ministry of Health.
Reply to the opinion of the Tamil Nadu government that which is such a sovereign state committee, the counter said, “according to the Country Investigation Commission is the right government only in connection with the commission designated by him to make any investigation that can be revived with all The entry mentioned in the List of Constitutional State.
“This is separate, the committee formed contradicts various assessment of the Supreme Court approving the NEET examination along with various aspects, he added.
“The reference made for the committee is not only a little to the status and privileges of the Supreme Court but also is the prosecution exercise because the law stated by the Supreme Court binds all functional,” he said.
Nagarajan has tried to cancel the command issued by the Tamil Nadu government on June 10, a committee headed by Justice K Rajan to study the impact of the NEET.
Top political parties, including DMK, in addition to Dravidar Kazhagam, has submitted a separate petition to import themselves as parties in the trial.
The first bench led by the Chairman of the Judge Sanjib Banerjee was scheduled to hear pills on July 13.
TN: ‘Neet Affront Panel to SC, under state legal force’
