New Delhi: Travel for decades for ordinary people in the labyrinth queue for justice forcing the Supreme Court on Wednesday to take the first step to allocate a strict time schedule, as practiced by the US and UK highest court, with the warning the deadline violation will produce Hearing delays are not limited automatically.
A judicial bench Sanjay K Kaul and R R Reddy switched 30 minutes to senior advocate A M Singhvi and Flat Arvind appeared for Yatin Oza applicants, one hour to Gujarat HC Counsel Nikhil Goel and 15 minutes to an interverer represented by senior advocacy C Sundaram.
Oza has challenged Gujarat HC’s decision to strab it from the appointment of senior advocates who found it repeatedly made a vitancerative comment on judges and justice, this case had been suspended for almost a year before SC and had reached a deadlock with consideration consideration.
Even with the encouragement of SC – his decision to strip Oza from the appointment of senior advocates.
HC conveyed to SC which on June 20 The full court meeting had repeated his decision, refused to show reduction in punishment to Oza.
Preparing the case for the final hearing, the bench said it would not allow advice for the parties to go argue for days.
“How do we justify the suffering of old cases for decades and then devote hours and hours together to hear arguments from senior advocates in cases today? Even in the UK or the highest US court, we don’t think there is any system Allows lawyers to argue for hours together “.
Keyilan Keul said, “At the US Supreme Court, the advice is only allowed to quote the assessment and not read it.
But, here the advocates quoted 20 ratings for each proposition and try to make their arguments by reading all 20 ratings”.
The bench told the advisor that they had to choose the best of the assessment according to their proposition and cite a judgment per proposition.
There is a general trend in SC where lawyers told the judge that he would take 10 seconds with hours in placing submissions.
However, more often than not 10 seconds stretching for up to 10 minutes.
Singhvi said, “For nine months he has been stripped of senior appointment, which is an adequate punishment for mild violations.
The applicant has studied permanent lessons.” The bench said that it would consider his request whether the HC sentence was applied according to or not.
To seep at justice, the Supreme Court improves a strict time limit for arguments
