Chandigarh: The Punjab High Court and Haryana have explained that only because both adults live together for several days, their claims about the relationship of live-in-relationship based on bald average may not be enough to hold on to a direct relationship.
HCs have the view that the length of the relationship coupled with the discharge of duties and certain responsibilities of each other makes such relationships similar to marriage relations.
Judge Manoj Bajaj from HC has passed this order while rejecting the request submitted by a partner from the Yamunanagar district in Haryana who sought refuge from their family members.
Caucularly claimed to have lived in direct relationships over the past few days.
HC also applies the cost of Rs 25,000 in a partner to apply like that.
“No doubt, another concept of live-in-relationship between two opposing adults has received recognition in India as well, because the legislature has injected several legitimacy in such alliances, while announcing” women’s protection from household violence laws , 2005 “and” Domestic Relations “are freely defined in section 2 (f).
However, regardless of this elasticity, some parts of the community are reluctant to accept such relationships.
Must be constantly borne that the length of the relationship coupled with duty discharge and responsibility Certain answers to each other make such relationships similar to marriage relations, “HC has been held.
The court also observed that the community, over the past few years, has undergone deep changes in social values, especially among young people who rarely pursue absolute freedom, leaving their parents companies, etc.
To live with people from their choices, and subsequently to get the seal of the court to their alliance, they submit a request for protection by pose a threat to their lives and freedom.
The next order states that the petition is usually based on the only arrest of a threat that is predicted to agree or the girl’s close relative, because the partner’s decision is rarely opposed by the Boy family member.
“The right to life together is based on a sudden, confidential and small marriage or after a relationship of live-in-relationship.
Of course, those who disadvantaged can use alternative medicines, but a large number of petitions landed on the lap of this court Writ petitions, alternative drugs are less satisfied.
The majority of such petitions contain formal symbolic average, reasons with the causes of imaginary action, and are rarely based on the existence of ‘actual’ or ‘real’ threats, and these types of cases consume a considerable time In this court, also at a cost.
Many other cases are waiting in line to hear, “HC has been held.
‘Together with a few days …’: HC on a direct relationship
