New Delhi: There is a “qualitative difference” in sexual equations between people who marry each other and among those who do not, Delhi’s High Court is observed on Friday, adding someone cannot “equalize lime and cheese”.
Justice C day Shankar, who is part of the bench headed by Justice Rajiv Shakdher, reminded Rebecca John, was appointed as Amicus Curiae to help court for petitions who tried to criminalize sexual rape from both parties in marriage, no rights such as not married parties ” This (provided by the legislature) by concentrating on approval, approval, agreement.
We cannot deny that there is an assumption of constitutionality in the law made by parliament.
Especially in the case of criminal we do not bend the provisions that are not considered as a violation, “Shankar said.
He wondered whether the court could” change our sensitivity or sensitivity “and” step into legislative shoes “to reverse legal provisions when there was a” rational basis for prime Facie “to be given by parliament.” It was a kind of dialogue which unfortunately since the first day I did not get an answer, had posed again and again …
we should not find a way to bend the provisions, “said the judge to Amicus, described it.
Reservations.
At the beginning The trial Friday, Shankar showed that someone could not “close my eyes” in the fact that there was a difference that could be understood between marriage and non-marriage relations.
“There is one case where a man does not have the right to ask at all to have sex because they don’t in marriage, but another case where he has the right to be sanctified with IMANATA n The marriage between them, he can expect natural sexual relations with a partner, “Shankar said.
‘Too much emphasis on wife’s approval’, Delhi HC to Amicus on marital rape
