New Delhi: Advocate Prshant Bhushan, emerged for Ehtesham Hashmi petitioner pills who seek an independent investigation into alleged communal violence in Tripura during the election of the Civil Agency last year, slammed the northeastern state on Monday at the Supreme Court to use ‘whataboherperious “in a statement Written by questioning the Bona fence from a common vibrant people for allegedly maintaining the silence during violence after the poll in West Bengal.
While looking for the time for the Hashmi applicant, who has requested an independent investigation into violence on the basis of the fact search report written together by it, for submit rejinder to the written statement of Tripura who adopted a shovel approach, Bhushan reversed the heat.
In the country ruled by BJP to use cheap arguments based on Whataabooker.
At the end of the day, when the bench Dy Chandrachud and Dinesh Maheshwari were difficult to pressure for time, said Bhus Han, “a country’s replies are only based on whatisweous and question the slander of the applicants only because they remain silent during violence after the poll in West Bengal.
This does not show state government in good light.
WhataboPerter is suitable for C-grade newspapers and TV channels and cannot be forced by the state government.
“The WhataboPerter is a weapon that is easy to use by mostly when the judicial heat on them, as evidenced by Affidavit Response Bhushan before SC when it was seeking his defense on the quantum issue of punishment after punishing him in the case of insulting in August 2020, to tweeting against SC and then CJI .
in the Affidavit 2420 in August 2020, Bhushan also appeared to ask – “What services my past to the institution?” Refusing to tender an apology, either conditional or unconditional, she said she never flinched in offering an apology for the errors and mistakes “There is already a privilege for me to serve this institution and bring some important causes of public interest in front of it.
I live with the awareness that I have received more than this institution than I have the opportunity to give it, “he said.
Recording his anxious award for SC, Bhushan said,” I believe that SC is the last fortress hope for the protection of rights Basis, supervisory agencies and indeed for the constitutional democracy itself.
This is truly called the most powerful court in the world of democracy, and is often an example for trials throughout the world.
My tweet represents this bona fide belief that I continue to survive.
The public expression of these beliefs is, I believe, in line with my higher liabilities as citizens and loyal officers in this court.
“Bhushan’s explosion trigger against the BJP government in Tripura was an affidavit of two days, who said” The petition by Hashmi is the result of and is based on the ‘Humanitarian Humanitarian Rev Report in Tripura’, which is an unilateral incidence version, excessive and distorted in Tripura and do not have the truth in the eyes of the law.
The situation in the state is always under control of the law enforcement machine.
“The Tripura government has said,” It is very surprising to note that only a few months ago, a series of pre-poll violence and polls took place in West Bengal which was definitely broader in geography and was very severe in the magnitude.
‘What is called the Public Spirit’ the applicant does not move a few months back in a larger scale communal violence (in West Bengal) and suddenly ‘public spirit’ they are aroused because some examples are small as Tripura.
“
‘Tripura Govt uses WhataboPerherious about violence’
