Mumbai: The temporary guarantee of the prosecution not to catch BJP MLA Nitesh Rane will continue until the pre-arrest guarantee request was decided by the Bombay High Court in connection with an attempt to kill the case last month in Sindhudurg.
HC will continue to hear the problem on January 13.
Niteen Pradhan’s senior adviser argued before justice CV Bhadang said the cause of violations of efforts to murder was “unreasonable” in the case against Rane.
The case was none other than the result of “lampooning” he was faced outside Vidhan Bhavan last month when BJP leaders protested, he said.
In the Roboinder he submitted, he said that there was a “actual hatred” in the investigation “for hidden political motives and the results of several Lampo outside Vidhan Bhavan on December 23, 2021,” added, “There is no explanation in a reply (police) both recognize or deny Material Witness Behavior Special Public Prosecutor Sudeep Pasbola has been proposed beforehand before Judicial CV Bhadang that there are no coercion steps taken until then fight them.
The guarantee continues.
Rane’s application says he and accused together involved and embarrassing them in public with their arrest, is the perfect example of abuse of abuse of political power to complete the score by taking into account the Catcalling events outside Vidhan Sabha “and also” the selection contested well ” From the Chairman of the Sindhudurg District Cooperative Bank where BJP won against the ruling party.
Reloinder on Tuesday also quoted “the important issue given by prosecution” In Kankavali, which is run by the government and outside the hospital media are present and the witness has made a statement against Rane and A CO -ascused even before the FIR was recorded at 4pm, at the Kankavali police station.
Pradhan said the journalist statement must be taken seriously before Continue with Appl Icatio N and must be placed before HC to put aside false implications from Rane.
Rejinder also said that the complainants apparently made by the political personality placed height and deputy head of Maharashtra minister who had visited Kankavali and attended the Sahakar Samruddhi Panel General Meeting on December 26 led by Shiv Sena, NCP and Congress, for “sacrifice and courageous courage “To hold the pressure of political leaders at Sindhudurg and have been named Rane in FIR.
Rane, in Roboinder also questioned why the country’s answer was silent about why there was no action committed against it or why he did not do it requested interrogation between 18 and 24 December when his name was disclosed – because of manipulation and concoction.
There is a reference only for “two abrasions in the chest” and “Fallacy Glowing” Case of prosecution is no explanation of the attack and injury attack, when the FIR itself says there is only a “one hit” and therefore submit a violation of an effort to kill under section 307 of Indian PE nal code “does not make sense.” Policy at Police Kankavli said that Sena Santosh Puriab officials, 44, allegedly stabbed in the chest on December 18 at 11pm by a man after being torn down from his motorcycle, hearing the alleged attacker – passengers in the car – said that they “must notify Gotanya Sawant and Nitesh Rane “.
He said Rane and a co-accused of being called by the police on December 24 and were interrogated for four hours and were allowed to leave, but on December 26, Kankavali police issued a call based on part 91 of the criminal procedure code – and therefore he filed an accusation – and therefore the application guarantees Anticipatory on December 27 which was heard for several days before being rejected.
So, on January 3, Rane moved HC, said Pradhan.
Application before HC said on December 18, 2021, four people were arrested by Kankavali police and other fifth men, arrested on December 20.
Chairperson on December 25 sent to vomiting detainees until January 6, 2022.
“Message, it has been observed that the medical complainant certificate shows that the injury is simple in nature,” the petition added that “it falsify” the charges of the “dragged” complainant ” Devotional “.