Two accused of attacking Delhi police provided guarantees – News2IN
Delhi

Two accused of attacking Delhi police provided guarantees

Two accused of attacking Delhi police provided guarantees
Written by news2in

New Delhi: City Court has guaranteed two people arrested for allegedly attacking the police.
It should be noted that if one of the injured policemen left the police station at 8:05, he could not receive confidential information at 7.20 a night about the defendant run when he was suspected of doing patrol tasks.
According to FIR, Sachin Dev Daidi’s sub-inspector and police chief Harender Kumar and Devender were patrolling the area.
Around 19:20, a informant told them that some boys ran Satta.
However, the documents submitted in Chargesheet are mentioned that Dangi has gone for patrol assignments at 08.05pm.
Additional Judge Sanjeev Kumar Malhotra said, “There was no satisfactory explanation given by the investigative officer why the information was given to the police station after about an hour alleged incident, although some other police officers had reached there.” The court further said it was surprising that Sheer swelling on the left side of Kumar’s face was used as a sad injury by a doctor.
It observed that Chargesheet’s example showed that even though the Medico-Legal case report from Daib and Kumar doctors had opened a pathetic injury properties, no x-rays or other materials were recorded to indicate that the injury was sad.
It directs that the copy of the order is sent to the hospital medical supervisor to check the base where the doctor gives an opinion.
The court also said that the copy of the order was sent to DCP (Shahdara) for the information and the next action needed.
The defendant, King and Nawabs Sarif, were given a guarantee to complete the bond of Rs 20,000 with one guarantee of each.
Advice for the defendant claimed that they were false involved in this problem and the doctor concerned only had swelling and lacerations as a sad injury under the influence of police officers.
The police opposed the guarantee request that the defendant was arrested for accusations with them to express their names.
They have been ordered under the IPC 186 section (hinders public servants in the disposal of public function), 353 (violence or criminal to prevent public servants from the release of their duties), 394 (voluntarily cause injured in carrying out robbery), 308 (an effort to commit a guilty murder ) and 34 (general intentions).

About the author

news2in