New Delhi: The center on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that it had nothing to do with cases of violence after the polls registered by the CBI in West Bengal and the lawsuit submitted by the state government in which the Indian union was made as a party could not be maintained.
The Attorney General of Venugopal told the bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao that the CBI became an autonomous body established under the special action of parliament was an agent who registered and examined cases and the center did not have a role in that.
“Union of India (UOI) has not registered one case.
It also does not have jurisdiction to register any criminal case.
Uoi has nothing to do with registering or investigating a case.” Uoi doesn’t care about any problems and there is ACT ‘Delhi Special Police Delhi (DSPE) Act ‘and officers from the establishment registers and investigate a case.
UOI is not the necessary party.
Therefore the coat cannot be submitted by the West Bengal government towards the UOI because the CBI is the party concerned, “AG told the bench also consisted of Judge BV Gavai and BV Nagarathna.
Venugopal handed the CBI that the CBI, was regulated under the DSPE law, And his officer is autonomous and how they conducted an investigation could not be disturbed by the center.
“Therefore register and investigate Pure FIR by an autonomous body.
Article 131 is for disputes between the center and state.
All claims and assistance against the CBI.
This is an autonomous body regulated under special parliamentary actions.
How relief was given to me (center) not to register the case, “said AG.
Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for West Bengal, saying there has been a full ridicule that has been made by the other party.” The lawsuit must be permitted.
There is no written statement that has been made until now and there is no appearance, “Lutra handed over.
The problem was posted to hear after two weeks.
The center previously told the court of the West Bengal’s strength to resist the approval for CBI not absolute and the probe agency has the right to conduct investigations What is being carried out against the Central Government employees or has an impact of PAN-India.
The center has submitted a written statement in response to a lawsuit by the West Bengal Government who accused the CBI will advance with investigations in cases of violence after the polls without securing a nodding from the country.
The APEX court that the Union of India has not registered a case in West Bengal, also has not investigated any cases.
Affidavit has said that many investigations are carried out on the Central Government employees or have a Pan-Indian impact or have an impact on more than one country to investigate the violation.
It was said that the approval of West Bengal was sought for several violations but was not understood why the state government stated such an inevitable investigation which would have an inevitable effect of protecting those who were guilty of multi-state / violation of Pan-India.
West West Government, in the original civil suit based on Article 131 Constitution, referred to the provisions of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Law in 1946 and said that the Central Investigation Bureau had continued with the probe and filing fire without nodding from the state government as a mandate under the law .
Based on Article 131 APEX court has original jurisdiction to deal with disputes between the center and state.
The CBI recently submitted several fires in cases of violence after the poll in West Bengal.
The state government was looking for a period of investigation into the firs to submit cases of violence after the poll by the CBI in pursuing the Calcutta High Court order.
The lawsuit said that as a general agreement given to the central body by the Trinamool Congress government had been withdrawn, the nesting firs could not be continued.
It also tries to remain to fir like that in the future.
Union of India has nothing to do with the case listed in West Bengal, body of CBI autonomy: center to SC
