Nagpur: Straightening that posting the Matrimonial profile on the internet during the suffering of the divorce process is a mental cruelty, the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court has given a divorce to a man.
Let the request of the husband of Resident Aurangabad, a division bench consisting of Judge Atul Chandurkar and Ga Sanap was held, “In the example of the matrimonial profile uploaded by his wife, it will show that even before the decision about divorce petitions in HC, he has made him mind to do marriage Secondly.
He posted his matrimonial profile on two websites like that with the information needed, where he explicitly stated that he was waiting for a divorce in a delayed case.
“Canceling the verdict of the Akola Family Court, the bench added that the wife’s move made his intention to be large.
“The document produced on the note in the form of the matrimonial profile uploaded by it on October 22, 2020, can be considered to decide on the question in this appeal.
Basically, it can be concluded that he wants to get rid of his husband and want to do marriage.
This Hers behavior is not consistent with facts -Fact who stated in a written statement.
“The couple entered Wedlock on July 4, 2014 in Akola and then went to Panjim, where the husband had a job in the court.
After a period of honeymoon, the dispute was developed in their relationship when the wife insisted on leaving work and found the others in Akola so she could live near her parents.
After his rejection, he allegedly started to harass him and refused to maintain any relationship.
He allegedly opposed his motherly ideas and was often used to go to his father’s house in Akola under one or other pretext.
He also filed a police complaint against him in Akola and another with the Women’s Commission, accused that the husband and father-in-law used to demand dowry and harass him.
He also submitted a case under the protection of women from the household violence law in the Akola family court.
It was said to be fed up with his behavior, the husband submitted a divorce request in the same court, argued that he had caused mental pain and suffering and made his life miserable.
However, the appeal was rejected, which he challenged in HC.
“During the fat petition, his wife made a conscious decision to do a second marriage.
His decision not to lead life with the husband was a big writing of the fact that he did not submit a request for the restitution of conjugal rights.
In facts and circumstances, we argue that the views taken by the judge The family court that denies divorce cannot be maintained, “said the judges.