Ahmedabad: The victim of Gujarat’s first complaint submitted under the Law of Freedom of Gujarat (Amendment), which is commonly referred to as Love Jihad Law, has approached the Gujarat High Court demanding that the FIR who lodged against her husband, in-laws, Qazi and witnesses must be canceled confirms that He was not forced to repent.
The 25-year-old complainant, a Hindu girl from Vadodara, is the first applicant in the complaints petition submitted in the High Court in August 5.
August.
While the other defendants claimed their innocence, the victims of the complainant had confirmed that he was not forced to surrender his religion.
Lawyers refuse to divulge the details of the petition, which is likely to come to hearing next week.
Practice Petition Submission of business in cases of approval, catungan in the High Court is that the victim made party respondents, who told the court that he had no problems if Fir-FIR was canceled.
But in this case, the victim himself has become a applicant who demands the issue of FIR.
On June 17, the woman had filed a complaint at the Gotri Police Station against her husband, who was a Muslim but allegedly identified himself as Sam Martin on social media.
He was friends with him and then married in February.
He complained that he was forced to change his religion.
The husband, his parents, a Qazi who netted marriage and two witnesses on marriage had been ordered based on the provisions of the Amendment Amendment of Gujarat religious freedom which came into force in the state of June 15 this year.
Her husband has been ordered on charges of domestic violence, rape and sodomy too.
Two weeks later, the woman was withdrawn from her complaint and stated at an oath that she was not forced to change her religion.
He handed his written statement in the session court in Vadodara and asked the court to guarantee her husband.
However, seeing the allegations flattened in this case, the Vadodara court refused the guarantee to her husband on July 5, taking into account the statement of the victim made before Judicial Judge under the 164 part of the CRPC, where he reportedly reaffirms his accusation.
On August 5, the husband’s guarantee request was withdrawn from the High Court after the judge did not tend to grant it.