Letter: From the beginning, Cybercrime Cells Police letters have pursued demons in the dark because their efforts mostly end in expeditions without results after the victim fails with their own complaints.
The reason mainly refers to one of the causes of speech – that the relationship between naughty cyberbullying and victims.
In many cases, these criminals are found are close relatives, friends or other people who are known and therefore, to avoid social stigma, victims prefer not to install fir.
Every month, around 20-odd cybercrime complaints, cells must handle 10 cases like that.
“Police are needed for a month to track the perpetrators because we have to collect details of several social media and internet service providers.
We must analyze a large amount of data to reach criminals but because of the reluctance of the victim at the end of the process, we have no choice but to let them go,” said A toi officer.
After the recurring incident, the police now suggested prevention as the key to stop cyberbullying and asking people to adopt cyber behavior responsible for personal protection.
Take the case of a 33-year-old Bank official who approached Cybercrime cells after he failed to convince an online brush to stop posting his changing picture.
The complainant told the police that all his requests through online messages to the person fell in deaf ears and he was forced to approach the police and filed a written complaint.
Based on the preliminary question, the police suspected it was a result of lovers’ lovers or insiders who had a personal photo of a complainant and he also threw his asphalt but not sure.
After a lot of digging, the police finally tracked it into a friend of a one-time woman who was unhappy that she was engaged.
In an effort to solve a new relationship, the perpetrators began to distribute pictures of officers after their friendship had been damaged a few months ago.
But, when he was produced at the police station, the complainant refused to peek into fir.
“In almost 50 percent cases of cyber intimidation, the complainants refused to submit a complaint after the culprit was identified,” said an officer in Cybercrime cells said, explaining that the most difficulties emerged because in most cases, the perpetrators were known or close people.
“It is true that to avoid social stigma, the victims avoid registering pine and also because the perpetrators are known people,” said Cyber ​​legal expert, Snehal Vakilna, added that ideally the complainants must stop further.
Harassment with other people.