Washington: The conservative shift of the US Supreme Court under Donald Trump has been full on display this week with a decision seen as a severe setback to abortion rights.
How the highest US court will rule other sensitive problems and how Democrats will respond to burning questions in Washington now.
Citing only procedural arguments, court, with the majority of 5-4, decreasing on Thursday to block the Law of Texas which effectively prohibits most of the abortion in the state.
Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said the verdict “represents a sharp right round in court.” Even if the court does not discuss the legal benefits of Texas, the decision to create “end-run” around ROE V.
Wade, Landmarks 1973 The Supreme Court case that serves the right of a woman for abortion.
Such a verdict would not be possible a year ago, note Schwinn, when the liberal feminist icon Ruth Baderb Ginsburg is still on the bench.
Ginsburg’s death in September 2020 gave Trump the opportunity to nominate all three justice to the court, strengthening 6-3 conservative majorities.
By confirming their independence, the judge did refuse Trump’s appeal to the court to cancel the results of the November 2020 presidential election.
But Texas’s decision revealed their true conservative colors.
“The curtain has a kind of drawn,” said Tracy Thomas, director of the Constitutional Law at Akron University in Ohio.
“Their decision making is influenced by their politics and environment in their jurisprudence and their belief system,” Thomas added.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the law of Mississippi later this year which will ban abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
“I hope that the court will sharply reduce the right to abortion under Roe V.
Wade, or all of them reject Roe v.
Wade,” Schwinn said.
The court was also scheduled to hear arguments in the case of New York which could limit the ability of the city or state authority to impose arms control laws.
“In addition to the first amendments and freedom of religion and abortion rights, we also see active judges and question all our administrative procedures,” Thomas said, adding this can affect “business problems, environmental problems.” “It crosses everything.
It is a broad enough activism,” he said.
“This is a conservative court …
who wants to leave inheritance in law.
It is clear that conservatives are more legally active than we have seen in the previous decades.
There are calls for months in the democratic left to increase the number of judges in court To dilute the effect of the conservative faction.
President Joe Biden initially said he was not a “fan” of the idea, but he then named the Bipartisan Commission to study the subject to reform the court.
The Commission was to submit his report before the end of the year.
Thomas said that while reforms could occur, “he question is whether it is politically and politically wisely.
“It has the potential to lead to a scenario where each party in the court is in court.
AD Infinitum.
Another idea is to limit the term of office of the judge, which currently serves a lifetime.” In some last year, I don’t think there are people Ang really thought that it was a decent choice, though, though, though, “if there has been a time to consider it, of course now.
“Biden issued a blistering statement after the Texas abortion decision, called it an” insult to the rule of law “and accused the court to release” unconstitutional chaos.
“Some Democrats in Congress.
Revives their calls for the highest national court reform.
But every effort to do so will meet the rigid resilience of the Republican Party in the Senate and Schwinn said that he did not expect meaningful reforms.