Categories: Hyderabad

Why all landowners suffer from Curbs GO111: T’Gana HC

Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Tuesday directed the government to notify it on August 9 why he avoided the decision about removing areas outside the twin reservoir catch zone, Sagar Himayat and Osman Sagar, from PurView GO111.
It banned industrial activities or large housing in the catchment area spread in 84 villages and within a 10 km radius of the twin reservoir.
The removal of this purview will mean the appreciation of real estate value in the area.
Chairman of the Chairman of Hima Hima Kohli and Justice B Vijaysen Reddy took the Imper Petition submitted by Agni Agro Tech Limited who was looking for the elimination of 17 hectares in Vattinagulapalli, one of 84 villages, because the land was outside the purview of the catchment area.
The bench asked the state government about why landowners who fell outside the water catchment area had to suffer the restrictions imposed by GO 111.
“Strange that the government did not want to act on reports treated by the Committee who studied the area in the country’s example,” Bench said , It tried to know the attitude of the government about this problem with the next hearing date and posting this case up to 9 Agni Agni Agro Tech could be applied in the petition and urged the court to continue to go 111.
KS Murthy’s advice urged the court to not disburse the purpose of the goal intended to protect environment and lake.
“If the country wants to melt it, let it be in harmony with the procedure set and we do not want this court to be a party for such decisions,” he said.
Appearing for the company, Senior Advocate K Vivek Reddy argues that land belongs to several landowners, such as companies he represented, is outside the catch area of ​​the lake and reports of environmental protection and research institutions (EPTRI) have confirmed the same.
It is a state government that institutionalizes EPTRI studies and all recommendations made by the Institute are accepted by the state.
“In fact, in one of the delayed cases before the High Court, the state government even applies that the area that falls outside the scope of the catchment area must be removed from PurView Go 111,” he said.
“We did not oppose GO 111 who protected the water catchment area.
What we were looking for was the removal of PurView Go 111 areas lying outside the catch zone,” he said.

news2in

Share
Published by
news2in

Recent Posts

44 ordered to attack the procession

Ludhiana: The police have submitted FIR to four identified and at least 40 unknown attackers…

3 years ago

Punjab: Police Reject conspiracy theory in the case of Deep Sidhu

Sonīpat / Ludhiana / Ambala: Actor Punjabi - Activist Activist Deep Sidhu, who died in…

3 years ago

Punjab: Hidden Strength Working Behind PM Narendra Modi, Arvind Kejriwal, said Rahul Gandhi

PATIALA / MANSA / BARNALA: Attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi and AAP National Convener Kejriawal,…

3 years ago

BJP made AAP to endanger the Congress, said Ajay

Jalandhar: BJP and AAM AAM AADMI parties are one party, Secretary General of the Ajay…

3 years ago

Our job is to make Punjab No. 1 State: Meenakshi Lekhi

Ludhiana: Minister of Union Culture Meenakshi Lekhi while campaigning to support the BJP candidate from…

3 years ago

Feb 20 is an opportunity to change the destiny of Punjab and his children: Bhagwant Mann

Machhiwara (Ludhiana): AAM AAM AADMI Party (AAP) Head of Punjab Candidate and Members of Parliament…

3 years ago