New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday takes a detrimental note about repeated slants from the judicial officer by Punjab and Haryana HC and said this would greatly affect the credibility of the inspection process controlled and managed by HC.
Chairman of the NV Judge Ramana and Judge Surya Kant and Hima Kohli told Nidhesh Gupta’s senior advocate, appearing for HC, “Each examination carried out by HC in the past two three years for the right petition selection to the Supreme Court.
Having a lost selection process Current? Every time there are complaints or others.
“The latest controversy was taken to court notice with advocate HS Ghuman, which has appeared in Punjab and Haryana Superior Judicial Services of the 2019 Main Examination.
The main complaint is that at the start of Paper-IV (criminal law) , Question papers handed over to candidates are incomplete.
The question contained in the paper is only for 160 values ​​instead of 200 marks.
When this difference is taken to notification of the design, the paper additional questions containing four more questions are given by the hacking.
At that time half time had passed.
This creates panic between candidates.
There is no additional time given to answer additional questions, he said.
In addition, candidates are told about the signs obtained on each paper, he added.
Although HC has stated the results of written examinations and conducting interviews from successful candidates, SC has ordered HC not to declare the results.
On Friday, the CJI bench said, “With great persuasion, the state government was asked to submit the judicial manion selection process to HCS.
If the selection process is managed and controlled by HC, such things should not occur.
This reflects the credibility of the institution, “Bench said.
Record Ghuman’s arguments about introducing four questions through the test, the bench said, “This is a clear case of discrimination.
How can you change the rules in the middle of the game? It is unthinkable that the paper question is incomplete and another set of four questions is given to Mid-stream candidate.
Whatever illegality and irregularities in the examination, the best choice is to provide the same opportunity for all candidates by conducting a new selection process.
HC must be very careful.
To maintain a fair inspection process.
“Gupta told the court that he would Take instructions from HC and respond again.
SC fixes November 18 for further hearing.
HC has dismissed the Ghuman petition on the technical foundation that has a malicious candidate not immediately raised the problem giving four additional questions in the midst of criminal law paper.
“He could not be allowed to raise complaints after the declaration of the results of the examination when he failed to qualify,” HC said.