New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday again pulled over farmers to continue their agitation even though they had remained three controversial agricultural laws.
“Nothing can be implemented.
What was the protected by farmers? Nothing other than the court can decide on agricultural legal validity,” said SC.
“When farmers are in court challenging law, why protest on the road?” Top field added.
Furthermore, said that challenging legal validity and and protests on the streets could not continue simultaneously, and added that it would transfer the Petition of Mahapachayat Kisan to challenge the validity of agricultural law itself.
The Supreme Court said he would check whether the right to protest was true, while hearing their requests to allow him to hold Satayavah in Mantar.
It is said the main question for adjudication is – “whether someone or body, once moved the Constitutional Court to challenge the validity of the law, can still use protests on the road in connection with the same problem.” The court has posted this problem to hear on October 21.
Also said that the previous center had explained that it would not implement agricultural law.
“Three non-existent agricultural laws and centers have provided efforts not to implement it, the SC bench headed by Justice Am Khanwilkar added.
The Supreme Court on Friday warns farmer groups to strangle the national capital with staging.
Protest on the highway against three agricultural laws .
The APEX court said the farmers had blocked not only the movement of people but also the armed forces and had suffocated traffic to and from Delhi.
The court said, “You have strangled Delhi by holding in a protest on the highway …
even blocking the armed forces movement and mock it.
Now you want to get into the city and create chaos? “The rebuke came after Mahanachayat Kisan moved the court to enter Delhi to hold peaceful protests in Mantar You have stopped the business.
Have you ever asked residents around the points of protests whether they are happy with protests, “It asks.
Kisan Mahapachayat said that denying permission to hold peaceful and not cruel and non-violent in the appointed place in Jantar Mantar who violated basic democratic rights Spoken as fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution.
It is said that the actions of authority are “discriminatory and arbitrary” as permits for protests have been given to other farmers’ bodies, Sanyukt Kisan Morcha, while denying them to regulate the staggered satyayavah.
Previously on Thursday, The Apex Court confirmed his objections to the highway blockade by farmers as part of their protest against three controversial agricultural laws.
SC has requested a center for “How did the highway blocked continuously?” And “it ended? “(With input from the agency)