New Delhi: The President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Millia Islamia Shifa-Ur-Rehman, who was arrested under an activity that violated the law (prevention) acting in connection with Delhi’s riots asked the court on Tuesday, why no FIR was registered against the Minister of Compatibility of Thakur, BJP Leader Kapil Mishra, and others was allegedly inciting riots.
During the hearing of the bail, a lawyer Shifa, Abhishek Singh, showed an additional session of the Amitabh judge who was treated by a complaint submitted by him on January 30, 2020, looking for registration of FIR against Thakur, Mishra, other BJP leader Parvesh Sharma, and Jamia Shooter RAM Bhakt Gopal allegedly “incited riots “.
“Does the prosecution even bother calling them witnesses or accusing or issuing notifications that we want to know something? Because they said ‘Shoot Xyz’ so they knew who the people were.
They will at least have some evidence.
Why there is no evidence.
Why is the FIR registered in them? This is a complaint that I pursue, “Singh said.
According to the complaint, as a lawyer in court, Shifa said that Mishra issued a rally in which the slogan to shoot was raised, after Thakur on January 28, 2020, said: “Dish to Gaddaron Ko …” In January 2020, Thakur was allegedly in a hurry In the selection rally participants to increase the burner slogan.
While the minister raised the slogan “Dish to Gaddaron Ko …
(state traitor)”, the crowd responded with singing: “Goli Maaro Saalon Ko …
(fired them).” Shifa was accused of collecting money to fund various protests sit against Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and national list of residents (NRC).
He, together with several others, has been ordered under the anti-terror law in this case to become “mastermind” from Violence February 2020, who has left 53 dead and more than 700 injured.
Touching on alleged funds, lawyers confirmed that Shifa had made “some financial arrangements” but questioned whether to pay several protesters made it a violation under a strict UPA.
Advocates Singh increasingly emphasized that being a member or president of the alumni association or a protester is not a violation when people have the right to their opinions and can peacefully protest anything.
“Why did I hang out? I failed to understand.
There are fundamental rights to protest.
If certain parts of the community are harmed by certain laws and protests against them, it is not a crime.
They can protest,” The lawyers told the court.
Furthermore, Shifa’s adviser sought a guarantee for him to say that there had been a systematic violation of his fundamental rights and that he could not be included in the rioting bracket.
He also read his Whatsapp chat to show that there was no encouragement of violence.
In addition to him, a former leader of the JNU Umar Khalid student, JNU Natasha Narwal students and Devangana Kalita, a member of the Jamia Safoowa Zargar coordination committee, former members of the AP Council Tahir Hussain and several others have also been ordered under strict law in this case.
Why is there no pine against Thakur, Mishra ?: Accused
