New Delhi: On the day when the sixth plenary of the Chinese Communist Party came out with the main historical assessment and paved the way for XI Jinping to become the President of a lifetime, India said it would not accept Chinese or “illegal” claims “.
on the border.
Responding to questions about the construction report of the villages “double use” in the border area, especially in Arunachal Pradesh, spokesman for MEA, Arindam Bagchi told reporters on Thursday that India had “expressed his strong protest with diplomatic activities and would continue to do it at Future.
“China, he said, has” carried out construction activities in recent years throughout the border region, including in areas that illegally occupied for decades.
India did not receive illegal occupation in our region also did not accept Chinese claims that did not It is justified Thursday, even when he said the release of the troops could occur in East Ladakh But overall de-escalation “taken away” Atchina has built what is called the “dual-use” village in the border region in the east sector in parallel with a new boundary law that empowers the village to take the role of combat with developments that are deemed to have the potential to increase tensions and place both countries in dangerous courses.
The US Department of Defense, in a report said in 2020, China built a 100-house civil village in the disputed area between the autonomous region of Tibet China and Pradesh Arunachal.
“The efforts of this infrastructure development and others along India-China have become a source of concerns in the Government and Media India,” said Pentagon.
Indian defense formation has tried to underestimate this problem.
In the background response to Journalists, defense officials said these villages had been under Chinese control since 1959.
“The village has been built by China in the area occupied by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) after beating Pos Rifles Assam in 1959, inside An operation known as Longju’s incident along the border in Arunachal Pradesh, “they said as quoted.