New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday underlines the need for high court judges to become clear and right on facts and laws when writing a verdict, saying that “inadequate that the decision is accurate, it must also be reasonable, logical and easy to understand”.
Expressing concerns over some assessments written by HC Judge, Judge D y Chandrachud and M R Shah said it was very difficult to appreciate what the judge was judged to be conveyed through assessment and court forced to stop new consideration.
Observing that the verdict, which was conveyed by Allahabad HC while providing a guarantee to five inmates for life, did not have clarity, the bench said that it was unfortunate that the SC bench must explain how the assessment must be written and and what to stirred.
SC set aside guarantee orders.
“Judgment must be coherent, systematic and organized logically.
This must allow the reader to track facts on logical conclusions based on legal principles.
This relates to checking important elements in the assessment to fully understand the art of reading the judgment,” Bench said.
“The judgment replicates the individuality of the judge and therefore it is necessary that it must be carefully and carefully written.
The reason in the assessment must be understood and logical.
Clarity and precision must be the goal.
All conclusions must be supported by recorded reasons.
Findings and Landing must be appropriate and specific.
Writing writing is art (and) involves the application of skilled laws and logic, “Bench said.
Even though the bench said that he realized that judges burdened with work, but said that quality could never be sacrificed for quantity.
“…
every time the assessment is written, it must have the clarity of facts; on the shipment made on behalf of rivals; discussions about legal points and after that reasoning and unclusion of the final …” he said.