Mumbai: Special prevention of the money laundering law (PMLA) recently provided guarantees to Ravindra Muley’s sub-registrar in the case of land Pune’s agreement registered by the Enforcement Directorate of the Nationalist Congress leader Eknath Khadse, observing that Prima Facie, April 2016 sales certificate did it It doesn’t seem to be underestimated for the payment of stamp duty, as a guess.
The court also said that there was less excellent facie evidence to show Muley’s relationship with co-disydang, Khadse and his actual involvement in any process related to the results of crime, acquisition or use.
Ed has alleged that Khadse conspires with the other two – his wife Mandakini and Daughter-in-law of Girish Chaudhari – to buy land in Bhosari, Pune District at the pressure value of Rs 3.75 Crore when the value is almost RS 23 Crore.
Muley, then the sub-registrar, in Haveli, Pune District, was accused of being united with them and misused his position to register sales by showing the market value at a price of less than Rs 4 Crore and did not insist on the certificate without objections (NOC.) From MIDC whose name appears in the column on land documents.
Muley was detained when he responded to Ed’s call.
Non-arrest as long as the probe is also a relevant factor for consideration for guarantees, the court said.
Lawyer Muley Mohan Tekavde argued and the court accepted that the Prima Facie, there was no loss caused by the state because he registered sales only after being satisfied that the appropriate stamp duty from RS 1.3 Crore was paid to the value of the Rade Reck RS.
22.83 Crore.
Tekavde also said the land was not acquired by MIDC and therefore there was no reason to find NOC and PMLA could not be called in this case.
The court said it was not shown that Muley was united to register a sales certificate that should not be registered.
For ED, the Special Public Prosecutor Kavita Patil has opposed Plea Bail Muley said it was a serious violation in which he had “deliberately ignored MIDC rights”.
He said if it was released, he could overcome the evidence or abscond.
“Prima Facie.” It did not appear that the selling deed was registered at 28.04.2016 underestimated for the purpose of paying stamp duty and was still registered by ignoring MIDC’s rights and interests in the country, “said the command authorized by Satbhai’s special judge.
The order said that it was not demonstrated that to register sales, NOC From MIDC it is pre-condition.
In addition, “in the ownership column, the name One Abbas Rasulbhai Ukani appears,” the command word, added that the registration action did not require the officer to verify the title of transfer.
Guarantee for personal release (PR).
Bonds and guarantees equal to rs 50,000.
Given the nature of his work, there is no possibility of escaping, if released by guarantee, the court said only as Rs 3.75 Crore and on the number of RS 3.75 Crore, stamp duty D Pay.
It seems that the stamp is appropriate.
The Task of Rs 1,37,05,000 at the 6 percent level at the market value of RS 22,83,63,300 has been paid to the deed.
“He added,” the accusation of No.
5 (Muley) cannot be blamed because the implementation of the selling deed shows the value of consideration of only Rs 3.75 Crore.
It seems that the correct stamp duty of 1,37.05,000 is paid at the market value.
“The court also referred to the assessment of the 2003 Bombay High Court to declare that” Registration Authority did not have the power to verify or ensure to verify or ensure whether the executance of the document has the right to property, which tries to be handled with documents presented for registration.
“He said,” Any questions by the registration authority in terms of property title, which is a problem of documents presented for registration, will be outside the jurisdiction and strength of the authority.
“
Sub-registrar gets a guarantee if against Khadse
