New Delhi: The University of Delhi’s teacher group has written to Yogesh Singh, a University Chancellor Deputy, increases objections to the two models of the National Education Policy Framework (NEP), which has been sent to college and department for feedback.
Both models are not synchronous with what is forwarded during a legal entity meeting, they claim.
The suggested framework by DU has reduced credit to be obtained.
In the academic and executive council meetings, decisions were taken to students who needed 148 credits for three years and 196 courses for the four-year program.
However, in one of the models, 140 and 184 each, while on the other hand, it is 124 and 164.
Credit reduction will mean the loss of academic rigidity and changes in workloads that affect teacher work, groups claim.
A letter from the National Democratic Teacher Front (NDTF), which has been signed by 25 teachers, said, “The two new alternatives proposed courses have reduced the total credit in the three-year honorary course, which will ultimately produce runny.
Course content and position Teaching / Teaching Position.
In one of the new proposed structures, all special courses of discipline and general selection letters are reduced to 4 credits instead of 6 credits and no scope for practical classes.
“They also claim the dilution of the course mandatory ability to increase.
Other teacher groups, the Teacher’s Democratic Front (DTF), said, “Model 1 framework with 184 credits set – the minimum credit to be obtained by students per semester is 18 credits and maximum is 30 credits.
However, students are advised to get credit each each per semester as specified in the framework.
a student through this provision can have a four-year degree with as low as 144 credits or 240 credits.
This is too large variations.
“DTF President Nandita Narain said,” Both concepts have no provisions for program courses – Ba, BCOM and BSC.
Arrested by the Academic Board includes these courses under different nomenclatures.
These courses are one of the most popular courses for students.
“The teachers have also objected to the research / project component entered at the mass level.
“This will lead to work that traces large at the undergraduate level or outsourcing,” Narain added.