Demolition of Temple: BJP Mlaas upset with Simeha – News2IN
Mysuru

Demolition of Temple: BJP Mlaas upset with Simeha

Written by news2in

MySuru: Legislators in Mysuru District seem to vary with MP Pratap Sime for the demolition of the proposed temple for development projects.
Krishnaraja Mla Sa Ramadas and Nanjangud Mla B Harshvardhan was annoyed with Simea for his attitude on this problem.
Harshvardhan, in fact, has demanded MP by creating interference.
Simea, on the other hand, has justified his attitude about this problem by stating that he only struggled for the causes of Hindus.
Recently, Mahadevamma Temple in Huchchagani Village in the Nanjang Assembly Constituency was destroyed after the issuance of orders by the Supreme Court.
Demolition kick storms, with leaders, cut various political parties, condemning action.
Among those who opposed the demolition was the former Minister of Main Siddaramaiiah.
SIMHA visited the site where the temple stood and vowed to reconstruct.
The Panjiud MLA Harshvardhan said, “He created a disturbance in my election.
This is the second time he stirred a problem in Nanjiud.
When a pharmaceutical company in Nanjud turns into an episentrus for the Covid-19 cluster case , He has kicked a storm.
“He showed that he had protected 13 of the 15 temples marked for demolition.
“Most temples were destroyed in the Udupi District and Dakshina Kannada.
Simea had to question the demolition of the temple everywhere.
Drive demolition was carried out in accordance with the order of the Supreme Court.
Similar drives were carried out in Gujarat too.
I don’t know whether such a drive can be stopped,” said Harshvardhan.
Nanjangud Mla accused Simea to spoil the politics of ‘caste’.
“The village of Huchchagani offers a large vocaligas population.
The temple was only 15 years old; if it was a legacy structure, why it was not protected by an Indian archaeological survey,” said Harshvardhan.Ramadas also expressed displeasure on Simea’s statement.
“Efforts are being carried out to protect the temple legally.
My opinion is very different from Simeha about this issue.
Temple 101 Ganapathi in Agrahara will be protected.
There is no threat to the temple,” Ramadas said.
Establishing this problem, Simeha said, “I, first and foremost, a Hindu .
“People with me, who are enough,” Simeha added.

About the author

news2in